What are people's thoughts on asterisk 1.2.26? Any show stopping bugs? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080117/57d1002d/attachment.htm
I have a remote user on a Polycom IP Phone who has set call forwarding by accident and is away from the phone. Does anyone know of a way to remotely un-forward the phone? I tried to reboot the phone but that didn't work and removing the mac-phone.cfg caused problems -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080117/fad9cab9/attachment.htm
** Bump ** On Jan 17, 2008 3:00 PM, Matt <mhoppes at gmail.com> wrote:> What are people's thoughts on asterisk 1.2.26? Any show stopping bugs? >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080118/7e8d699a/attachment.htm
On 15:00, Thu 17 Jan 08, Matt wrote:> What are people's thoughts on asterisk 1.2.26? Any show stopping bugs?Apart from the fact asterisk 1.2 is in security maintenance mode only and wont get any other bugfixes it will be ok. Please consider using 1.4 as it's the official latest stable version. -- Michiel van Baak michiel at vanbaak.eu http://michiel.vanbaak.eu GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x71C946BD "Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?"
William Stillwell (Ki4swy)
2008-Jan-20 16:31 UTC
[asterisk-users] asterisk-1.2.26.tar.gz Thoughts?
I have been running 1.4.17 since its release, and no kernal panics. Before that I was running 1.4.13 without any kernal panics. System Specs: 4 Core Xeon 5110 @ 1.6Ghz (two dual proc chips) 8 Gb Ram 400GB Raid 5 SAS Array ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Ira <ira at extrasensory.com> Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:20:56 -0800>At 11:53 AM 1/18/2008, you wrote: > >>Apart from the fact asterisk 1.2 is in security maintenance >>mode only and wont get any other bugfixes it will be ok. >>Please consider using 1.4 as it's the official latest stable >>version. > >Although for some of us, or at least me, no version of 1.4 has run >for more than 72 hours before generating a kernel panic. I've tried >about 6 versions, the early ones were good for about 10 minutes, the >latest one lasted 3 days. Sadly I'm still stuck using the latest 1.2. > >Ira > > >_______________________________________________ >-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > >asterisk-users mailing list >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >________________________________________________________________ Sent via the WebMail system at kotbh.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 William Stillwell (Ki4swy) wrote:> I have been running 1.4.17 since its release, and no kernal panics. > > Before that I was running 1.4.13 without any kernal panics.I was getting kernel panics from HPEC, but it was because I was using the i386 binary and not the i686 one. I called Digium, they logged in, sorted it out, and everything works fine now. - -- Kind Regards, Matt Riddell Director _______________________________________________ http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution) http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html) http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHk9I5DQNt8rg0Kp4RAr2cAJ90nLPYTF171HAqGS0mkynDnXplbwCffVn9 ml1B2uVBnVmEbsterwsP0y4=kuDX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----