Hello, I'm running into a few situations on lossy network links where a SIP jitter buffer w/ some PLC would be helpful. My main TDM gateways are running 1.2 (which is solid, stable, reliable and very very very well behaved when you know it's limitations), but I'm considering upgrading them before the end of the year to 1.4. Two of the main reasons that I would do this are Variable Length DTMF and SIP Jitter Buffering. I would be very interested in hearing from anyone that is actually running 1.4 in a PRODUCTION environment, gatewaying SIP to TDM using Digium cards. To me, production means being able to have 3-4 PRI circuits maxed out for 12+ hours a day and 7+ call setups / second. Anything less than that is not really going to be an accurate comparison to what I have running. Anyone have any feedback about this combination?
Gregory
We have many Asterisk 1.4.13 in production solid like a rock.
Couples examples:
a) Asterisk 1.4.13 + Unicall + 2 E1 MFCR2 Digium + Legacy PBX
60+ Extentions / IVR / 10~30 concorrent calls
b) Asterisk 1.4.11 + 1 E1 ISDN PRI Digium
50+ Extentions / IVR / 5 Queues / ~2000 call/day
c) Asterisk 1.4.13 + 4 E1 ISDN Digium (working in progress)
CallCenter / 150 PAs / 15 Queues / expected 8000 calls/day
--
Luc
Gregory Boehnlein escreveu:> Hello,
> I'm running into a few situations on lossy network links where a SIP
> jitter buffer w/ some PLC would be helpful. My main TDM gateways are
running
> 1.2 (which is solid, stable, reliable and very very very well behaved when
> you know it's limitations), but I'm considering upgrading them
before the
> end of the year to 1.4. Two of the main reasons that I would do this are
> Variable Length DTMF and SIP Jitter Buffering. I would be very interested
in
> hearing from anyone that is actually running 1.4 in a PRODUCTION
> environment, gatewaying SIP to TDM using Digium cards. To me, production
> means being able to have 3-4 PRI circuits maxed out for 12+ hours a day and
> 7+ call setups / second. Anything less than that is not really going to be
> an accurate comparison to what I have running.
>
> Anyone have any feedback about this combination?
>