rjcarvalho@reit.up.pt
2007-Jun-11 10:58 UTC
[asterisk-users] Multiple ENUM entries and Asterisk fails to dial
Hi, I use Asterisk 1.2.17 in my site, and now I'm trying to configure ENUM lookup in my server. When someone calls a number that has multiple ENUM entries, randomly Asterisk seems to fail to return a correct answer, and dial by ENUM fails. I've goggled a bit on this, but didn't get any good conclusion. There is some RFC Compliant ENUM Macro that can be used that is announced to solve this problem, but also it can be read that "It seems that Asterisk 1.2.0 comes with a new powerful ENUMLOOKUP. So there is probably no need to use this script anymore.". Should I still use that macro? It is already closed a Digium Issue Tracker concerning "handle multiple records with the same order and priority", so, this problem shouldn't be arising anymore, shouldn't it? Does Asterisk 1.4 already solves this issue? Regards, Ricardo. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070611/561fdca0/attachment.htm
Remco Post
2007-Jun-11 14:52 UTC
[asterisk-users] Multiple ENUM entries and Asterisk fails to dial
rjcarvalho@reit.up.pt wrote:> Hi, > > > I use Asterisk 1.2.17 in my site, and now I'm trying to configure ENUM > lookup in my server. > > When someone calls a number that has multiple ENUM entries, randomly > Asterisk seems to fail to return a correct answer, and dial by ENUM fails. > > > I've goggled a bit on this, but didn't get any good conclusion. There is > some RFC Compliant ENUM Macro that can be used that is announced to > solve this problem, but also it can be read that "It seems that Asterisk > 1.2.0 comes with a new powerful ENUMLOOKUP. So there is probably no need > to use this script anymore.". Should I still use that macro? >enumlookup works greak, as far as I can tell.> It is already closed a Digium Issue Tracker concerning "handle multiple > records with the same order and priority", so, this problem shouldn't be > arising anymore, shouldn't it? > > Does Asterisk 1.4 already solves this issue? >just as well as enumlookup in 1.2> > Regards, > Ricardo. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Remco Post "I didn't write all this code, and I can't even pretend that all of it makes sense." -- Glen Hattrup
Maybe Matching Threads
- can ENUMLOOKUP query multiple DNS servers without having to replicate the same code for each server?
- write some custom values to CDR table
- Forcing Dial application to skip if called server is unreachable
- Enum parse errors
- Asterisk - e164 (enum) lookup confused