search for: enumlookup

Hi all, Does ENUMLOOKUP can query multiple DNS servers without having to replicate the same code in which the only thing replaced is the server? If I use ENUMLOOKUP(${exten}), Asterisk will parse enum.conf file to find the list of DNS servers in order of preference to be queried, but, I pretend to use something lik...

...lem might be as I've had Enum up and running in the past. I'm running the latest CVS-Head compiled version. I've also tried using the new Enum function with the same results. When doing a lookup on a number that exists in the enum server I get the following results: -- Executing EnumLookup("SIP/MarcSnom-e69d", "18886532145") in new stack Oct 13 22:55:51 WARNING[2208]: app_enumlookup.c:89 enumlookup_exec: The application EnumLookup is deprecated. Please use the ENUMLOOKUP() function instead. Oct 13 22:55:52 WARNING[2208]: enum.c:235 parse_naptr: NAPTR Regex matc...

Hello, After upgrading to 1.4 my ENUMLOOKUP returns nothing. Even with new format. I've tried commands: SET(foo=${ENUMLOOKUP(+13015611020,,,,loligo.com)}); ${ENUMLOOKUP(+13015611020,ALL,c,,e164.org)}; Could I turn debug of ENUMLOOKUP on? Thanks. Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scr...

Hi all, In my server dialplan, it first tries to dial possible SIP URI contacts returned by DNS lookups using the ENUMLOOKUP function; it only sends calls to PSTN when there aren't any NAPTR records of the dialed number. Problem arises when my Internet connection is down to some locations, which inhibits my Asterisk server to reach the DNS servers to do those lookups. In those cases, calls only get sent to the PSTN a...

Does anyone have a better ENUM lookup handler than the built-in ENUMLOOKUP() function? The built-in function does not properly handle multiple return values such as: 8.9.9.3.2.8.8.6.6.8.1.e164.org has NAPTR record 200 10 "u" "E2U+SIP" "!^\\+1866(.*)$!sip:1866\\1 at tollfree.sip-happens.com!" . 8.9.9.3.2.8.8.6.6.8.1.e164.org has NAPTR record...

I would like to implement enum lookup in my dial plan but searching for solution / implementation I'm getting confused what is current standard. On some pages I read that the ENUMLOOKUP is not in development anymore and suggesting on using Enumlookup.agi scrip , some are saying that Asterisk 1.2.0 comes with a new powerful ENUMLOOKUP. So there is probably no need to use this script anymore; so I'm confused as to what should I use. Where can I find good Howto (with good expla...

...sterisk, whats the recommended mechanism for dialling with ENUM lookup? At the moment I user SIPbroker, but am getting tired of it hanging on certain numbers, so I was thinking about implementing it myself. I've seen various vo-ip.info pages (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+EnumLookup) talking about the func ENUMLOOKUP instead of EnumLookup Application, but then I'll need to implement my own logic around this right?? Thanks, Adrian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachm...

I use ENUM lookup in my dialplan before sending calls through my PSTN trunk. One problem arises... When ENUMLOOKUP finds an SIP contact for that e164 number, Asterisk dials that contact, but when the remote server that should answer the call is down, or the IP link is down for some reason, the dial to PSTN trunk (which has the next priority) only takes place after the ring time of Dial application has expir...

You can play also with www.enum2go.com <http://www.enum2go.com/> or wap.enum2go.com Regards Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040727/6c42c39d/attachment.htm

...s for the call, and I'd like to have * try ENUMENTRY1, ENUMENTRY2, .., ENUMENTRYN just in case the first result is temporarily unable to handle the call. In at least some cases, I'd also like the order in which the servers in the enum results are tried to be random. The wiki pointed me at enumlookup.agi for enum support of multiple NAPTR results per lookup. By default, enumlookup.agi will either return equal order/priority NAPTRs as a single &'d result, or individual ones in order according to NAPTR defined order and priority. What I'd prefer is for equal order/priority results t...

Since e164.org added DNC and ADDRESS records my enum configuration has failed. Using both the old EnumLookup app and the new ENUMLOOKUP function, the lookups have consistantly failed since e164.org added E2U+ADDRESS and E2U+DNC records. Mar 6 17:39:44 WARNING[14222]: enum.c:235 parse_naptr: NAPTR Regex match failed. Mar 6 17:39:44 WARNING[14222]: enum.c:354 enum_callback: Failed to parse naptr :( Mar...

...answer, and dial by ENUM fails. I've goggled a bit on this, but didn't get any good conclusion. There is some RFC Compliant ENUM Macro that can be used that is announced to solve this problem, but also it can be read that "It seems that Asterisk 1.2.0 comes with a new powerful ENUMLOOKUP. So there is probably no need to use this script anymore.". Should I still use that macro? It is already closed a Digium Issue Tracker concerning "handle multiple records with the same order and priority", so, this problem shouldn't be arising anymore, shouldn't it?...

...quot; in front of the area code, which happily is also our "country" code for NANP.) This example is for people who are using SIP or IAX only as your protocols (no H.323): [from-my-desktop-phones] ; ; Let's see if the number is an ENUM-enabled number... ; exten => _011X.,1,EnumLookup(${EXTEN:3}) ; ; EnumLookup will result in success, which goes to n+1, or ; if a tel: answer is provided, it jumps to n+51, and if ; the lookup fails entirely it will jump to n+101. The two ; failure cases (n+51 and n+101) should just jump to the ; pointer for normal case dialing out an...

Hello all you Gurus out there! Please could you explain something to me: Currently I try to get ENUMLOOKUP() working. Naturally I do all the testing with my own number. I registered my number at e164.org I paid for registration of my number at a registration agent for e164.arpa (I know, I don't need both. I just did the .arpa registration first and later discoverd the free .org service....) Assume...

...quot; before any international ; call. So, to dial a number in the UK (44) we would dial ; 0114480033330000 as an example. I need to strip the first ; three digits off the number to get the e164 number, which ; just starts with the country code and everything after it. ; exten => _011X.,1,EnumLookup(${EXTEN:3}) ; ; EnumLookup will result in success, which goes to n+1, or ; if a tel: answer is provided, it jumps to n+51, and if ; the lookup fails entirely it will jump to n+101. The two ; failure cases (n+51 and n+101) should just jump to the ; pointer for normal case dialing out an analog...

Hi, I've two yocto questions about the syntax of dialplan: 1. What's the "official" notation of each line: "=>" or "=" ? In the wiki of Asterisk, I see very often "=>", however, what's the reason for both syntaxes authorized ? Historical ? 2. To write info in logs/console, you have two commands: NoOp and Verbose. Verbose seems to be

Here's a segment of my dialplan, I'm working on the freenum/ISN functionality: same => n,Set(isnresult=${ENUMLOOKUP(${EXTEN},sip,,1,freenum.org)}) same => n,GotoIf($["${isnresult}" != ""]?:fn-CONGESTION,1) ; set up our outgoing call state same => n,Set(SIPFROMUSER=${CALLERID(num)}) same => n,GotoIf($["${GLOBAL(FREENUMDOMAIN)}" == ""]?dial:) same => n,Set(SIPFRO...

...this "failed" call over to another provider, so that the user can complete the call? (Dialstatus was an idea, but the line does not show up in CLI) [Apr 5 09:22:36] -- Executing SetCIDNum("SIP/601-5039", "601|a") in new stack [Apr 5 09:22:36] -- Executing EnumLookup("SIP/601-5039", "+12124615222") in new stack [Apr 5 09:22:36] -- Executing Dial("SIP/601-5039", "SIP/0000000000@voipstunt") in new stack [Apr 5 09:22:36] -- Called 0000000000@voipstunt [Apr 5 09:22:37] WARNING[4274]: chan_sip.c:9613 handle_respon...

...outbound-freenum2] exten => _X!,1,Verbose(2,Performing ISN lookup for ${EXTEN}) same => n,Set(SUFFIX=${CUT(EXTEN,*,2-)}) same => n,GotoIf($["${FILTER(0-9,${SUFFIX})}" != "${SUFFIX}"]?fn-CONGESTION,1) same => n,Set(TIMEOUT(absolute)=10800) same => n,Set(isnresult=${ENUMLOOKUP(${EXTEN},sip,,1,freenum.org)}) same => n,GotoIf($["${isnresult}" != ""]?from) same => n,Set(DIALSTATUS=CONGESTION) same => n,Goto(fn-CONGESTION,1) same => n(from),Set(__SIPFROMUSER=${CALLERID(num)}) same => n,GotoIf($["${GLOBAL(FREENUMDOMAIN)}" = "&...

...basic exit codes could be given different places to >land. In my example, exit-1 is the place where we should jump on a >"-1" exit code, exit0 is where we go on a zero result, and exit1 is >"error but continue" in situations like Busy, and so on. >Applications like ENUMLookup, as an example, would have to document >two different "error but continue" codes, currently represented by >the +101 on no ENUM reply (turns into exit code 1) and +51 on TEL >(turns into exit code 2). > >Syntax: >exten => extension,[priority[/exit-1[/exit0[/exit1[/......