shawnl@up.net
2007-Apr-16 05:24 UTC
[asterisk-users] Difference between SCCP and Cisco Call Manager traffic?
I'm wondering about the difference between Cisco Call Manager and SCCP(2) network traffic. I'm working on getting a Cisco 7960 phone to speak through a NAT to an asterisk box, without having to do a bunch of port forwarding on the NAT device. Without the nat, everything works fine. If the phone is behind a cisco pix that is doing the natting, it works fine (fixup protocol). If the phone is behind a more generic nat device, such as a linux box running ipfilter. Then it can dial out, but there is no audio. The interesting part is that this same phone, behind the same NAT works just fine if it is talking to a Cisco Call Manager box instead of an asterisk server. So, I'm wondering what the difference in the protocols is (I no longer have access to the call manager box, so I can't look @ the traffic). In a perfect world, I'd like to have the phone pretty much just work wherever it's plugged in as long as it can see the asterisk server. Any ideas ? Thanks Shawn
Steve Dickey
2007-Apr-16 05:56 UTC
[asterisk-users] Difference between SCCP and Cisco Call Manager traffic?
Call setup/teardown is handled with the SIP protocol while the actual call audio is handled with RTP I think. Check the config of your NAT devices relative to RTP. scd On 4/16/07, shawnl@up.net <shawnl@up.net> wrote:> > I'm wondering about the difference between Cisco Call Manager and > SCCP(2) network traffic. I'm working on getting a Cisco 7960 phone to > speak through a NAT to an asterisk box, without having to do a bunch of > port > forwarding on the NAT device. > > Without the nat, everything works fine. > > If the phone is behind a cisco pix that is doing the natting, it works > fine (fixup protocol). > > If the phone is behind a more generic nat device, such as a linux box > running ipfilter. Then it can dial out, but there is no audio. The > interesting part is that this same phone, behind the same NAT works just > fine if it is talking to a Cisco Call Manager box instead of an > asterisk server. So, I'm wondering what the difference in the protocols > is > (I no longer have access to the call manager box, so I can't look @ the > traffic). In a perfect world, I'd like to have the phone pretty much just > work wherever it's plugged in as long as it can see the asterisk server. > > > Any ideas ? > > > Thanks > > > Shawn > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >-- Steve Dickey Who is John Galt? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070416/263a237a/attachment.htm