Douglas Garstang
2006-Oct-10 22:17 UTC
[asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing list
I think that limit was increased in 1.6.6 or 1.6.7. -----Original Message----- From: C F [mailto:shmaltz@gmail.com] Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 6:57 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing list On 10/10/06, Eric ManxPower Wieling <eric@fnords.org> wrote: > What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. I believe it's because the limit of how many can be monitored at once, someone correct me if I'm wrong. > > Jessee J Holmes wrote: > > A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are currently > > working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our customer's > > (who posted in here earlier this week). > > > > There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and the 2.01 > > firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over the > > Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature that stops > > working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware revision > > 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. A couple > > new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be set in > > order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system. > > > > In the sip.cfg file: > > > > feature feature.1.name="presence" feature.1.enabled="1" > > > > In the phone[mac].cfg file: > > > > <attendant attendant.uri="user_112@password_112" attendant.reg=""/> > > > > > > However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup (i.e. LEDs > > not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently testing in our > > labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't seem to > > follow the "standards" for presence support and are currently working to > > change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their > > phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the "standards" > > (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications Server). > > > > This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, Digium, > > and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll continue > > working on this issue within our labs and post an official answer when > > one is available. > > > > Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute > > working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look at it and > > work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for everyone AS > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Jessee J Holmes
2006-Oct-11 07:19 UTC
[asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" mailing list
Limit was increased in firmware 2.0.1. NOTE: a new Polycom Administrator's guide is now also available covering the 2.0.1 features. Re-obtain this manual if you haven't from your reseller or from Polycom direct if you're certified. Jessee Holmes Atacomm / Ataractic Corporation www.atacomm.com V: 1-877-700-VOIP jholmes@atacomm.com Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http:// voipstore.atacomm.com/ On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:01 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:> I think that limit was increased in 1.6.6 or 1.6.7. > > -----Original Message----- > From: C F [mailto:shmaltz@gmail.com] > Sent: Tue 10/10/2006 6:57 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Cc: > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] RE: Welcome to the "asterisk-users" > mailing list > > > > On 10/10/06, Eric ManxPower Wieling <eric@fnords.org> wrote: > > What I don't understand is why people MUST use the 2.0.x firmware. > > I believe it's because the limit of how many can be monitored at > once, > someone correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > > Jessee J Holmes wrote: > > > A few of our technical support staff here at Atacomm are > currently > > > working on this issue with Polycom, Digium and one of our > customer's > > > (who posted in here earlier this week). > > > > > > There are some major differences from the 1.x.x firmware and > the 2.01 > > > firmware. Obviously, many on here, voip-info.org, and all over > the > > > Internet have reported troubles where their presence feature > that stops > > > working after they upgrade their Polycom phones to firmware > revision > > > 2.0.1 when the phones are configured with an Asterisk system. > A couple > > > new things have been added to the .cfg files that MUST now be > set in > > > order for presence to work again with an Asterisk system. > > > > > > In the sip.cfg file: > > > > > > feature feature.1.name="presence" feature.1.enabled="1" > > > > > > In the phone[mac].cfg file: > > > > > > <attendant attendant.uri="user_112@password_112" > attendant.reg=""/> > > > > > > > > > However, there are still confirmed problems with this setup > (i.e. LEDs > > > not working), which Polycom and ourselves are currently > testing in our > > > labs trying to fix. The reasoning for this is Digium doesn't > seem to > > > follow the "standards" for presence support and are currently > working to > > > change this functionality within Asterisk. Polycom designed their > > > phones, and specifically their firmware, to work with the > "standards" > > > (more specifically, the Microsoft LCS - Live Communications > Server). > > > > > > This issue has been reported on multiple instances to Polycom, > Digium, > > > and ourselves; but, no real resolution is completed yet. We'll > continue > > > working on this issue within our labs and post an official > answer when > > > one is available. > > > > > > Sorry for the bit of bad news, if anyone is willing to contribute > > > working / half working code, we'd be more than happy to look > at it and > > > work with Polycom and Digium on getting this fixed for > everyone AS > > _______________________________________________ > > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > > > asterisk-users mailing list > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061011/cfb210a3/attachment-0001.htm