asterisk users - Oct 2005 - IAX or IAX2 ?

Hi,

I have read the wiki entries on IAX(2), but I'm afraid, it still have some 
questions:

I have a working connection between two Asterisk-Servers (Asterisk 
1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k on Debian 3.1) via IAX. 
Does this connection work with IAX or IAX2? 

When I try to load chan_iax2.so, I get the error message

chan_iax2.so]Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:258 
ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_iax2.so: undefined symbol: 
ast_check_signature
Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:391 load_modules: Loading module 
chan_iax2.so failed!

[modules.conf]
	[modules]
	autoload=yes

	noload => pbx_gtkconsole.so
	noload => pbx_kdeconsole.so
	noload => app_intercom.so
	noload => chan_modem.so
	noload => chan_modem_aopen.so
	noload => chan_modem_i4l.so
	noload => chan_modem_bestdata.so
	noload => chan_alsa.so
	noload => chan_oss.so
	noload => rate_engine.so
	nolo	ad => chan_zap.so

	load => res_features.so
	load => res_musiconhold.so
	load => chan_capi.so
	load => chan_sip.so
	load => chan_iax2.so

	[global]
	chan_capi.so=yes

Does Asterisk automatically use IAX, but IAX2 only when it is loaded via 
modules.conf?

Google doesn't return a lot of entries for "undefined symbol: 
ast_check_signature"

Thanks for any hint,

Stefan

On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:35:28AM +0200, Stefan-Michael. Guenther (in-put GbR)
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have read the wiki entries on IAX(2), but I'm afraid, it still have
some
> questions:
IAX1 is probably hardly used anywhere. Chances are that where people
write IAX they mean IAX2
> 
> I have a working connection between two Asterisk-Servers (Asterisk 
> 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k on Debian 3.1) via IAX. 
> Does this connection work with IAX or IAX2? 
IAX2
> 
> When I try to load chan_iax2.so, I get the error message
The channel name is iax. Yet it provides commands such that begin with
"iax2" and listens on port 4569.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen         | tzafrir@jbr.cohens.org.il | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |                           | a Mutt's  
tzafrir@cohens.org.il |                           |  best
ICQ# 16849755         |                           | friend

Hello,
> From: Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir@cohens.org.il>
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX or IAX2 ?
>
> IAX1 is probably hardly used anywhere. Chances are that where people
> write IAX they mean IAX2
>
ok.
> > I have a working connection between two Asterisk-Servers (Asterisk
> > 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k on Debian 3.1) via IAX.
> > Does this connection work with IAX or IAX2?
>
> IAX2
>
ok.
> > When I try to load chan_iax2.so, I get the error message
>
> The channel name is iax. Yet it provides commands such that begin with
> "iax2" and listens on port 4569.
>
??? In /usr/lib/asterisk/modules the name of the file ist chan_iax2.so and as 
far as I understood, I have to enter the file name in modules.conf, right?
But if I do this, I get the error 

chan_iax2.so]Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:258 
ast_load_resource: /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_iax2.so: undefined symbol: 
ast_check_signature
Oct 11 10:09:52 WARNING[2288]: loader.c:391 load_modules: Loading module 
chan_iax2.so failed!

during the start. 
Well, so Asterisk is using IAX2 without an entry in modules.conf ?

Stefan