Andrew Kohlsmith
2005-Jul-24 11:27 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardware echocan)
I just wanted to post here and let everyone know that the TE406P (quadspan T1/E1 with hardware echo can) kicks some serious ass. We've been running a PRI now for over a year with Asterisk (every single call in and out is through two Asterisk boxes, including faxes) and while the software based echo cancellation is more than adequate, we'd get the occassional "edgy" echo and very infrequently get full-out "holy shit" echo. So far the TE406 has eliminated that entirely. Anyway as I said I just wanted to post here and tell the world that at least as far as I have been able to determine, the extra cost of the hardware echo can is *well* worth the money. -A.
Chris Modesitt
2005-Jul-24 13:30 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardwareechocan)
Man I almost passed from laughing when I read this, that is the best description of bad echo I have ever heard:) -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 12:28 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardwareechocan) I just wanted to post here and let everyone know that the TE406P (quadspan T1/E1 with hardware echo can) kicks some serious ass. We've been running a PRI now for over a year with Asterisk (every single call in and out is through two Asterisk boxes, including faxes) and while the software based echo cancellation is more than adequate, we'd get the occassional "edgy" echo and very infrequently get full-out "holy shit" echo. So far the TE406 has eliminated that entirely. Anyway as I said I just wanted to post here and tell the world that at least as far as I have been able to determine, the extra cost of the hardware echo can is *well* worth the money. -A. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Rod Bacon
2005-Oct-03 19:09 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] success story: TE406P (quadspan with hardware echocan)
Which version of asterisk and zaptel are you using? Will they work with 1.0.9 ? =========================================Rod Bacon Empowered Communications Ground Floor, 102 York St. South Melbourne Victoria, Australia. 3205 Phone: +613 99401600 Fax: +613 99401650 FWD: 512237 ICQ: 5662270 ========================================= Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:> I just wanted to post here and let everyone know that the TE406P (quadspan > T1/E1 with hardware echo can) kicks some serious ass. > > We've been running a PRI now for over a year with Asterisk (every single call > in and out is through two Asterisk boxes, including faxes) and while the > software based echo cancellation is more than adequate, we'd get the > occassional "edgy" echo and very infrequently get full-out "holy shit" echo. > > So far the TE406 has eliminated that entirely. > > Anyway as I said I just wanted to post here and tell the world that at least > as far as I have been able to determine, the extra cost of the hardware echo > can is *well* worth the money. > > -A. > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >