Hi, I have not implemented any of the spa-2000's yet. Do they work ok with asterisk? Is the 2000 capable of having 2 FXS extensions off each one or is it two fxs ports with the same extension?
> Hi, I have not implemented any of the spa-2000's yet. Do they work ok > with > asterisk? Is the 2000 capable of having 2 FXS extensions off each one or > is > it two fxs ports with the same extension? > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >The Sipura 2000 can have have the 2 FXS ports each with its own extension. They work very well with asterisk, when asterisk is in the local network that the sipura is in. Over the internet it should work but it is harder to get working, I have been working on getting a sipura to work remotely to an asterisk server, and I got it to register to an asterisk server over the internet, but it did not work, I think it is probably something in the configuration of asterisk or the firewall. One limitation of the sipura 2000 is that you can not use both ports at the same time with the G729 codec, I belive this may be due to the sipura having an smal CPU that can not handle the load of 2 G729 codecs. Other limitations are the lack of GSM, and iLBC codecs. Overal the sipura is very good. Sergio
yes On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:38:27 -0600, Henry Devito <hdevito@qwest.net> wrote:> Hi, I have not implemented any of the spa-2000's yet. Do they work ok with > asterisk? Is the 2000 capable of having 2 FXS extensions off each one or is > it two fxs ports with the same extension? > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Which codecs do you use for the second call?> One limitation of the sipura 2000 is that you can not use both ports at > the same time with the G729 codec, I belive this may be due to the sipura > having an smal CPU that can not handle the load of 2 G729 codecs. > > Other limitations are the lack of GSM, and iLBC codecs. >
> Which codecs do you use for the second call? > > >> One limitation of the sipura 2000 is that you can not use both ports at >> the same time with the G729 codec, I belive this may be due to the >> sipura >> having an smal CPU that can not handle the load of 2 G729 codecs. >> >> Other limitations are the lack of GSM, and iLBC codecs. >> > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >I use G711u, it works great, however it is on the same network as asterisk. Over the internet trying to get a sipura 2000 to connect to asterisk and work has not been succesful, the closest I got it to work was when the sipura 2000 registered correctly with asterisk, what makes this a little more dificult is the fact that I have a dynamic IP. Any links on how to get a sipura 2000 to connect to asterisk remotely over the internet ?
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Henry Devito wrote:> Hi, I have not implemented any of the spa-2000's yet. Do they work ok with > asterisk? Is the 2000 capable of having 2 FXS extensions off each one or is > it two fxs ports with the same extension?They work pretty well, but I'm not impressed with the sound quality. Sound is quite soft and I have to adjust the input and output gains to something like +3 or +5 for in+out and then an annoying hiss is audible. I do not have this hiss/noise on Snom ip phones....