asterisk users - Jan 2005 - Moderator on vacation?

OK, 

I'm trying to send an email to the list the contiune a thread which
describes a problem I'm having.  This particualy email I wish to send
contains an ls -l describing my problem (too many open files) and is
apparently too large to be considered a "normal" post, so I get a
message that it's being held until a moderator can view it.

Fine.

So now I get an autoresponder from the moderator telling me he's on
vacation until someone near the end of the month.

Seriously, what gives.  Can we make some changes here?  I'd like to
post my findings and get some help.

- Eric

On January 7, 2005 11:08 am, Eric wrote:
> I'm trying to send an email to the list the contiune a thread which
> describes a problem I'm having.  This particualy email I wish to send
> contains an ls -l describing my problem (too many open files) and is
> apparently too large to be considered a "normal" post, so I get a
> message that it's being held until a moderator can view it.
If you got that message it means you posted to the list from an address that 
is not subscribed.  It's a little misleading -- I've *never* had a
moderator
post or deny a message I've posted from a nonsubscriber address, on vacation
or not.
> Seriously, what gives.  Can we make some changes here?  I'd like to
> post my findings and get some help.
Post to the list from an address that is subscribed, like you just did here.  
No human intervention required.  :-)

-A.

Eric wrote:
> Seriously, what gives.  Can we make some changes here?  I'd like to
> post my findings and get some help.
I can't get google to show me any, but there are sites that allow you to 
drop off large files and give you a url for retreiving them. Perhaps 
someone can come up with the name of one.

Find a site, upload it there, post your message with info and point us 
at the link.

-- 
Andrew Thompson
http://aktzero.com/
http://dev.asteriskdocs.org/

On Friday 07 January 2005 16:08, Eric wrote:
> OK,
>
> I'm trying to send an email to the list the contiune a thread which
> describes a problem I'm having.  This particualy email I wish to send
> contains an ls -l describing my problem (too many open files) and is
> apparently too large to be considered a "normal" post, so I get a
> message that it's being held until a moderator can view it.
Do you really think we need to see the entire output from an ls command?
If there are duplicates either at the file or directory level, then use
the normal "[...]" syntax to show similar line have been deleted.