> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Parlee [mailto:listbox@jesca.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 6:10 PM
> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] CVS version tags
>
>
>
> Can someone please tell me which version tags I should be
> using when checking out with cvs. Right now I have two
> directory trees:
>
> 1) /u1/src/asterisk/asterisk-stable
>
> 2) /u1/src/asterisk/asterisk-dev
>
> #1 has "Tv1-0_stable" in the CVS/Tags file. I haven't used
> tags a whole lot, but I'm guessing that I checked this tree
> out with "cvs -z9 co -r v1-0_stable asterisk". I just tried
> to do "cvs -z9 update -d" and it wouldn't complete. Am I
> doing something wrong or is this tag no longer valid?
>
I believe that 1-0_stable has been superceded by v1_0_rc_1.
If you want to use the latest stable version try:
cvs co -r v1_0_rc_1 asterisk
> #2 has no CVS/Tags file. When I do "cvs -z9 update -d"
> everything works fine. But, isn't this the up-to-the-minute
> development version of asterisk? I need to be running
> something stable that doesn't crash.
>
Those commands certainly do download the latest up-to-the-minute
Version of asterisk. It is possible that some bugs and whatnot
will be found, but I have found that CVS Head is pretty stable.
Untill RC1 was released I was using the latest CVS for our main
production system.
> Thanks for your help!
>
Glad to be able to help.
> -Ryan
>
Robert Jackson
