Is this supported? I have a very simple setup where I have 2 X100P cards and a TDM10B. The TDM10B is connected to a phone that has a digital answering machine built into it. If I make an inbound call on either X100P interface it gets transferred to the TDM10B interface. If I let it ring the TDM10B interface answers the call and the greeting message of the answering machine starts. Then shortly after that, it seems like the dial application exits because the TDM10B interface hungup. my extensions.conf file is as follows: exten => s,1,Dial(ZAP/3) exten => s,102,Hangup Log output from asterisk -vvvvc is: Zap/2 is a X100P interface Zap/3 is the TDM10B interface -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' -- Executing Dial("Zap/2-1", "ZAP/3") in new stack -- Called 3 -- Zap/3-1 is ringing -- Zap/3-1 is ringing -- Zap/3-1 is ringing -- Zap/3-1 is ringing -- Zap/3-1 answered Zap/2-1 -- Attempting native bridge of Zap/2-1 and Zap/3-1 -- Hungup 'Zap/3-1' == Spawn extension (from-comcast, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Executing Hangup("Zap/2-1", "") in new stack == Spawn extension (from-comcast, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' Regards, Adam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040804/9ce7fd68/attachment.htm
try removing your s,102 statement ----- Original Message ----- From: Adam Bezanson To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 12:11 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Using answering machine in my phone Is this supported? I have a very simple setup where I have 2 X100P cards and a TDM10B. The TDM10B is connected to a phone that has a digital answering machine built into it. If I make an inbound call on either X100P interface it gets transferred to the TDM10B interface. If I let it ring the TDM10B interface answers the call and the greeting message of the answering machine starts. Then shortly after that, it seems like the dial application exits because the TDM10B interface hungup. my extensions.conf file is as follows: exten => s,1,Dial(ZAP/3) exten => s,102,Hangup Log output from asterisk -vvvvc is: Zap/2 is a X100P interface Zap/3 is the TDM10B interface -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' -- Executing Dial("Zap/2-1", "ZAP/3") in new stack -- Called 3 -- Zap/3-1 is ringing -- Zap/3-1 is ringing -- Zap/3-1 is ringing -- Zap/3-1 is ringing -- Zap/3-1 answered Zap/2-1 -- Attempting native bridge of Zap/2-1 and Zap/3-1 -- Hungup 'Zap/3-1' == Spawn extension (from-comcast, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Executing Hangup("Zap/2-1", "") in new stack == Spawn extension (from-comcast, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/2-1' Regards, Adam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040805/94676381/attachment.htm
Andrew Kohlsmith
2004-Aug-05 05:49 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Using answering machine in my phone
On Thursday 05 August 2004 00:11, Adam Bezanson wrote:> Is this supported? I have a very simple setup where I have 2 X100P cards > and a TDM10B.Should work without any problems whatsoever.> If I let it ring the TDM10B interface answers the call and the greeting > message of the answering machineDo you hear the answering machine when you call? Can the answering machine hear you? (i.e. is it listening, not hearing anything and hanging up?) Have you played with any gain settings? Do you have any call progress options in zapata.conf for channel 2 or 3? Busydetect? Your post raises more questions than it seeks to answer. :-) Regards, Andrew
>>Actually, this may not be doing what you think. It remembers all of the >>options from earlier channels. This would work better if it was the >>first channel you defined.Ah thanks forgot about that. Still no difference though :(>>What happens if the *only* thing on the port is the answering machine?The answering machine is embedded in the phone. So that's the only thing connected to the line.>> I suspect the answering machine more than I suspect the phone.Me too. Something's indeed strange. I'll probably just end up using the Voicemail system in Asterisk then. Thanks, Adam -----Original Message----- From: Roger Gulbranson [mailto:roger@gulbranson.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 2:36 PM To: Adam Bezanson Cc: Roger Gulbranson Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Using answering machine in my phone On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 13:44, Adam Bezanson wrote:> Thanks, > As you suspected the AbsoluteTimeout didn't help. > I chopped the Zapata.conf file down to just > > context=from-internal > signalling=fxo_ks > channel => 3>>Actually, this may not be doing what you think. It remembers all of the >>options from earlier channels. This would work better if it was the >>first channel you defined.> Same thing happens. > What's strange is that if I pick up the phone before the answering machine > it works fine. Call says up until either party hangs up.>>OK, that says it works with *just* an analog phone.>>What happens if the *only* thing on the port is the answering machine?At this point I'm getting a bit stumped. The only things I have on my FXS ports are phones. Granted, the answering machine *should* act like just another phone.> Any chance the phone is doing something funny when the answering machine > picks up to make Asterisk thing the line went onhook? Then it's a fixed > timout after that before it hangs up the line?I suspect the answering machine more than I suspect the phone.> Thanks for all the suggestions so far,No problem.
Roger Gulbranson
2004-Aug-05 12:30 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Using answering machine in my phone
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 15:21, Adam Bezanson wrote:> Me too. Something's indeed strange. I'll probably just end up using the > Voicemail system in Asterisk then.FWIW, the voicemail system in Asterisk is pretty nice. Just one of the reasons I like the system as a whole.