Aye Bruce Komito High Sierra Networks, Inc. www.servers-r-us.com (775) 284-5800 ext 115 On Fri, 28 May 2004, Rich Adamson wrote:> > Isn't it about time to lock down added functionality to v1.1 and fix > the remaining bugs? > > There has been a significant amount of traffic on the cvs list, the irc > and other channels with folks spending time adding new functionality to > Head. Think its time to lock it down, fix the bugs that have been introduced, > and get to "something" that the _majority_ can agree to call v1.1 Stable > in real production terms. > > It's a known fact that bugs are not being fixed in Stable, and even Mark > has suggested no one should be running Stable in a production environment. > > There has been a number of postings in the last few days relative to bugs > in sip, iax2, zaptel, codecs, etc. The add-on folks are obviously also > having problems keeping up with modifying patches to a constantly moving > target, and applying those to Stable is fruitless. > > I'd even suggest that no v1.2 Head be created until such time as the > majority of bugs are fixed, and that souce _then_ copied to whatever > the next version is going to be called. > > All in favor? > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
Isn't it about time to lock down added functionality to v1.1 and fix the remaining bugs? There has been a significant amount of traffic on the cvs list, the irc and other channels with folks spending time adding new functionality to Head. Think its time to lock it down, fix the bugs that have been introduced, and get to "something" that the _majority_ can agree to call v1.1 Stable in real production terms. It's a known fact that bugs are not being fixed in Stable, and even Mark has suggested no one should be running Stable in a production environment. There has been a number of postings in the last few days relative to bugs in sip, iax2, zaptel, codecs, etc. The add-on folks are obviously also having problems keeping up with modifying patches to a constantly moving target, and applying those to Stable is fruitless. I'd even suggest that no v1.2 Head be created until such time as the majority of bugs are fixed, and that souce _then_ copied to whatever the next version is going to be called. All in favor?
Hi Rich, Sounds like a good idea. Umar --- Rich Adamson <radamson@routers.com> wrote: >> Isn't it about time to lock down added functionality > to v1.1 and fix > the remaining bugs? > > There has been a significant amount of traffic on > the cvs list, the irc > and other channels with folks spending time adding > new functionality to > Head. Think its time to lock it down, fix the bugs > that have been introduced, > and get to "something" that the _majority_ can agree > to call v1.1 Stable > in real production terms. > > It's a known fact that bugs are not being fixed in > Stable, and even Mark > has suggested no one should be running Stable in a > production environment. > > There has been a number of postings in the last few > days relative to bugs > in sip, iax2, zaptel, codecs, etc. The add-on folks > are obviously also > having problems keeping up with modifying patches to > a constantly moving > target, and applying those to Stable is fruitless. > > I'd even suggest that no v1.2 Head be created until > such time as the > majority of bugs are fixed, and that souce _then_ > copied to whatever > the next version is going to be called. > > All in favor? > > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ____________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
Olle E. Johansson
2004-May-28 07:37 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Time to lock down v1.1?
Rich Adamson wrote:> It's a known fact that bugs are not being fixed in Stable, and even Mark > has suggested no one should be running Stable in a production environment. >On the other hand, there's not many bugs open in the bug tracker. Feature requests and patches, but not bugs. If you are aware of bugs in stable or head, please report them a.s.a.p. so we can start fixing them. Life as a bug marshal has been quite easy for a while, with Mark fixing bugs like crazy and not many new bugs being reported. I guess you do not want the bug marshals to fall asleep and live a bug-free life :-) 1.0 will be the stable release. There hasn't been many fixes to that one lately, only MAJOR bug fixes has been applied. It will not be relased according to any plan, remember - this is Open Source. It will be released when considered stable with no open bugs. 1.1 (today's head) is more of a "let's try if this works' release. Please spend time testing it. Remember, CVS HEAD, is not meant to be stable. Now and then, it might not even compile cleanly. It's a developer's release, at some point in future aimed to be stable. And, as always, when reporting, don't forget to report which version you are running, on which platform. /O
Rich Adamson [radamson@routers.com] wrote:> Isn't it about time to lock down added functionality to v1.1 and fix > the remaining bugs? > > There has been a significant amount of traffic on the cvs list, the irc > and other channels with folks spending time adding new functionality to > Head. Think its time to lock it down, fix the bugs that have been > introduced, and get to "something" that the _majority_ can agree to call > v1.1 Stable > in real production terms. > > It's a known fact that bugs are not being fixed in Stable, and even Mark > has suggested no one should be running Stable in a production environment. > > There has been a number of postings in the last few days relative to bugs > in sip, iax2, zaptel, codecs, etc. The add-on folks are obviously also > having problems keeping up with modifying patches to a constantly moving > target, and applying those to Stable is fruitless. > > I'd even suggest that no v1.2 Head be created until such time as the > majority of bugs are fixed, and that souce _then_ copied to whatever > the next version is going to be called. > > All in favor? >I'm in favour of that. Make it so. -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ kevin@cursor.biz _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/
Rich Adamson wrote:> Isn't it about time to lock down added functionality to v1.1 and fix > the remaining bugs? > > There has been a significant amount of traffic on the cvs list, the > irc and other channels with folks spending time adding new > functionality to Head. Think its time to lock it down, fix the bugs > that have been introduced, and get to "something" that the _majority_ > can agree to call v1.1 Stable in real production terms. > > It's a known fact that bugs are not being fixed in Stable, and even > Mark has suggested no one should be running Stable in a production > environment. > > There has been a number of postings in the last few days relative to > bugs in sip, iax2, zaptel, codecs, etc. The add-on folks are > obviously also > having problems keeping up with modifying patches to a constantly > moving target, and applying those to Stable is fruitless. > > I'd even suggest that no v1.2 Head be created until such time as the > majority of bugs are fixed, and that souce _then_ copied to whatever > the next version is going to be called. > > All in favor? >Me too!!! It would be though very nice to know the difference between head and stable!