Tried to DL using CVS this eve, and it says: Unknown host cvs.digium.com. Has Asterisk development stopped?
> Tried to DL using CVS this eve, and it says: > Unknown host cvs.digium.com. > > Has Asterisk development stopped? >all good here, check your dns settings
All good here also.. this has got to be in the to 10 stupidest things posted to the mailing list today. bkw On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Adam Hart wrote:> > Tried to DL using CVS this eve, and it says: > > Unknown host cvs.digium.com. > > > > Has Asterisk development stopped? > > > > all good here, check your dns settings > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > > All good here also.. this has got to be in the to 10 stupidest things > posted to the mailing list today.Stupid as in development stopped, agreed. However, there have been times in the past where cvs.digium.com has not resolved for me either. Now, seeing that both nameservers apparently are on the same subnet (216.207.245.1 and .12 respective), I would guess that the intermittent "unresolved" messages are due more to connectivity problems to the nameservers. Two rules of thought when I comes to placement of NS servers: 1) If the name servers are local to the domains the resolve for, no need for geographic distribution. I.e., if the network is unavailable for a [short] period of time, ain't no one getting there no how. 2) Place a slave DNS server at some other location. In the event of that same outage or lack of connectivity to the destination, names will resolve but the connection will timeout. I guess the morale is, if you can't resolve cvs.digium.com, shake the Magic 8 Ball and Try Again Later. Regards, --- Gavin
> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Carl A. Cook > On Tuesday 30 December 2003 06:16 am, Adams, Gavin wrote: > > Stupid as in development stopped, agreed. > > Be advised, that the newest tarball is 4 months old. Can you explainto> me what a normal visitor to the website is supposed to think, when CVS > does not resolve and old tarballs?Well, since you subscribed to the list, I would think that the daily volume of messages would indicate the status of *. Carl, you'll be surprised at some of the messages that come through here. :) However, you are preaching to the choir in regards to the tarballs and release schedules for OSS projects. The good news is that a few users have spent a goodly amount of time prepping CVS to support tags, releases and other.... goodness. This should make it easier to support easier things such as daily tarballs. Jesse over at RT (http://www.rt.com) has a nice environment doing just that.> Not sure any more I'm interested in learning this, to put up with > reflexive schite. There's enough crap in the world.It's a rough crowd around here, but you'll get used to it. Just don't incorrectly attribute or create a message from an old thread and you'll miss most of the truly shite posts. :) Best regards, --- Gavin
> Tried to DL using CVS this eve, and it says: > Unknown host cvs.digium.com. > > Has Asterisk development stopped?Digium was just sold to Microsoft. Philipp
Philipp von Klitzing wrote:>>Tried to DL using CVS this eve, and it says: >>Unknown host cvs.digium.com. >> >>Has Asterisk development stopped?> Digium was just sold to Microsoft.I must reset my date, is it already april 1:st? exten=> 20040401,1,SayKlitzingTime() /O :-)