Hi, I have just got my SNOM 200 to start doing some real testing with *.. I am trying to use the GSM codec but the quality is really bad, Is that normal? does anyone actually use GSM?? Also are there any 'gotcha's' that I need to look out for so I don't spend hours trying to get somthing working that really doesn't work anyway.. Thanks.. later.. -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze
gsm works fine with other devices. there're issues with * & snomX00 matteo. On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 19:31, WipeOut . wrote:> Hi, > > I have just got my SNOM 200 to start doing some real testing with *.. > > I am trying to use the GSM codec but the quality is really bad, Is that normal? does anyone actually use GSM?? > > Also are there any 'gotcha's' that I need to look out for so I don't spend hours trying to get somthing working that really doesn't work anyway.. > > Thanks.. > > later..
WipeOut . writes: > I am trying to use the GSM codec but the quality is really bad, Is > that normal? does anyone actually use GSM?? kphone (free linux sip ua) has gsm support and it has worked fine against cisco and microsoft gsm codecs. so it is not normal that gsm codec has poor quality. -- juha
This works for me. In sip.conf disallow=all allow=ulaw We use snom200's, and had the same problem. David Davis Senior Programmer, Smooth Corporation 425-455-7642 -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of WipeOut . Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 10:32 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and SNOM 200 Hi, I have just got my SNOM 200 to start doing some real testing with *.. I am trying to use the GSM codec but the quality is really bad, Is that normal? does anyone actually use GSM?? Also are there any 'gotcha's' that I need to look out for so I don't spend hours trying to get somthing working that really doesn't work anyway.. Thanks.. later.. -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Same thing with snom100 :( I have to use uncompressed (adpcm ulaw) codec:( On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 20:13, Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:> gsm works fine with other devices. > there're issues with * & snomX00 > > matteo. > > On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 19:31, WipeOut . wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just got my SNOM 200 to start doing some real testing with *.. > > > > I am trying to use the GSM codec but the quality is really bad, Is that normal? does anyone actually use GSM?? > > > > Also are there any 'gotcha's' that I need to look out for so I don't spend hours trying to get somthing working that really doesn't work anyway.. > > > > Thanks.. > > > > later.. > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
The bandwidth requirements for the ulaw codecs are just too high.. Looks like I will have to buy the G729 codec at the end of the day if there is no solution for the the issues with GSM.. Later.. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Davis" <david@smoothcorp.com> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:50:54 -0700 To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and SNOM 200> This works for me. > In sip.conf > > disallow=all > allow=ulaw > > We use snom200's, and had the same problem. > > David Davis > Senior Programmer, > Smooth Corporation > 425-455-7642 > > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of WipeOut . > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 10:32 AM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and SNOM 200 > > > Hi, > > I have just got my SNOM 200 to start doing some real testing with *.. > > I am trying to use the GSM codec but the quality is really bad, Is that > normal? does anyone actually use GSM?? > > Also are there any 'gotcha's' that I need to look out for so I don't > spend hours trying to get somthing working that really doesn't work > anyway.. > > Thanks.. > > later.. > > > -- > ______________________________________________ > http://www.linuxmail.org/ > Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr > > Powered by Outblaze _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze
does kphone + gsm work with *? mark On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Juha Heinanen wrote:> WipeOut . writes: > > > I am trying to use the GSM codec but the quality is really bad, Is > > that normal? does anyone actually use GSM?? > > kphone (free linux sip ua) has gsm support and it has worked fine > against cisco and microsoft gsm codecs. so it is not normal that gsm > codec has poor quality. > > -- juha > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >