In light of recent flame baits and advertisements sent to the list, I would like to seek opinions of list members on making the list moderated. I certainly don't have time to moderate the list myself, so I would suggest giving at least a half dozen, maybe more, people the ability to approve posts to keep it flowing quickly. Moderators would be asked just to approve/disapprove based upon a specific list of characteristics. Among characteristics that *could* be considered: * Posts should not advertise products, especially not those unusuable under Asterisk * Posts should not contain profanity * Posts should not simply be "me-too"'s * Arguably, maybe something related to flame baits Any comments on any of these rules, or suggestions for others, that would make the list more valuable? Mark
I feel that the list should be unmoderated. However, I do think several people would have authority to warn a poster that they are out of line. If they refuse to stop, they are banned from the list. --Eric On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 18:43, Mark Spencer wrote:> In light of recent flame baits and advertisements sent to the list, I > would like to seek opinions of list members on making the list moderated. > I certainly don't have time to moderate the list myself, so I would > suggest giving at least a half dozen, maybe more, people the ability to > approve posts to keep it flowing quickly. Moderators would be asked just > to approve/disapprove based upon a specific list of characteristics. > Among characteristics that *could* be considered: > > * Posts should not advertise products, especially not those unusuable > under Asterisk > * Posts should not contain profanity > * Posts should not simply be "me-too"'s > * Arguably, maybe something related to flame baits > > Any comments on any of these rules, or suggestions for others, that would > make the list more valuable? > > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >
> In light of recent flame baits and advertisements sent to the list, I > would like to seek opinions of list members on making the list moderated.I`m not against moderating if required, however I don`t think we should yet - for the following reasons: 1 - As of this point, pointless rants/abuse is minimum (ie moderated list not needed yet imho) 2 - Moderating slows down conversations (and sometimes things go missing) 3 - Moderating creates a bucket-load of work for people that would be better speant replying to posts and improving * (this is the killer for me)> * Posts should not advertise products, especially not those unusuable > under AsteriskI agree with the latter, but not the former. That blanket ban would include a posting about a new product like the cheap hardware SIP phones being discussed atm for example - which would hinder the lists value. What I propose instead: 1 - Rule list with consequences easily available - and must be read before people sign up. (Possibly emailed to the list every month or so, newsgroup style?) 2 - If rules violated, warnings provided by 'moderating team' 3 - If rules routinely violated, banning by 'moderating team' 4 - Mailing list non-moderated, direct mode as it currently is. 5 - Review this in say 6 months to see how it is working (ie if a fully moderated list is required) What do other people think? Cheers, Mathew
Folks A view from down under Leave it as it is for present. Apart from the recent silliness over flaming and advertisments which were quickly chastised by all and sundry there has been remarkably little of this type of behaviour. If the chastisement of the group in general is sufficient to keep it under control please leave as it is. It save the additonal overhead off having moderators. I relish this group for having the opportunity for all to share from the novice to expert. I do not wish to see additonal overhead on Digium and those who are key to this exciting forum. Thanks to all for good work, I always have my delete button and it got used for the above events. Regards Peter Armstrong Auckland, New Zealand
Okay thank you all for your advice. I will continue to keep the list unmoderated, and we might bring it up again in another several months. Mark
On Monday 07 April 2003 19:43, Mark Spencer wrote:> In light of recent flame baits and advertisements sent to the > list, I would like to seek opinions of list members on making the > list moderated. I certainly don't have time to moderate the listPersonally I like it when the violater is told off-list. This way we don't have to follow that thread either. -- Steve Szmidt ___________________________________________________________ HTML in e-mail is not safe. It let's spammers know to spam you more, and sets you up for online attack through IE 4.x and above. Using HTML in e-mail only promotes it as safe to the uninitiated.
This was posted last year by Mark. I figured I'd repost it to refresh peoples memories. Please stop posting commercial postings and announcements to the *-users and *-dev. Let's self moderate so the list doesn't have to be moderated James ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:43:17 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Spencer <markster@digium.com> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Should List be Moderated? In light of recent flame baits and advertisements sent to the list, I would like to seek opinions of list members on making the list moderated. I certainly don't have time to moderate the list myself, so I would suggest giving at least a half dozen, maybe more, people the ability to approve posts to keep it flowing quickly. Moderators would be asked just to approve/disapprove based upon a specific list of characteristics. Among characteristics that *could* be considered: * Posts should not advertise products, especially not those unusuable under Asterisk * Posts should not contain profanity * Posts should not simply be "me-too"'s * Arguably, maybe something related to flame baits Any comments on any of these rules, or suggestions for others, that would make the list more valuable? Mark _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
<quote who="James Golovich">> And thus Asterisk-Biz was born. > (http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz)<asterisk-biz-request@lists.digium.com>: unknown user: "asterisk-biz-request" So, when will it be fully up? -- END OF LINE -MCP
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
- Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
- Sanity, Manners and Shorewall Support
- Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct
- Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct