search for: approve

On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 4 May 2015 at 21:55, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > I am no longer accepting new patch nominations for the 3.6.1 branches. > > There are a handful of outstanding patches waiting for approval from > > code owners, I may still merge these if I get code owner approval before > > the

...e is for example a simple data set about approval ratings on two different surveys for a random sample of 1600 individuals. > ## Example: Ratings of prime minister (Agresti, Table 12.1, p.494) > rating <- matrix(c(794, 86, 150, 570), 2, 2) > dimnames(rating) <- list(First = c("approve", "disapprove"), + Second = c("approve", "disapprove")) > rating Second First approve disapprove approve 794 150 disapprove 86 570 It seems to me that, in order to fit a model using lmer...

...eally sure what is the process. The developer policy states: "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get approval, submit a patch <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you may commit it yourself." Do I have to send the patch to llvm-commits via email and wait for approval even when the patch has been accepted in the reviews (i.e. Phabricator) ? Best, Stefanos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://list...

I have time-series data on approval ratings of British Prime Ministers. The prime ministers dating from MacMillan onward till today are coded as dummy variables and the approval ratings are entered for each month. I want to know the mean value of the approval rating of each Prime Minister in the dataset and the approval rating during his/her first month and last month as PM. What R code should

...you provide some examples of the problems you are seeing? Here is what happens. I get a message "could you please include/add/merge this r16xxxx into 3.2?". And my immediate reaction is sure, no problem this fixes PR/issue/crash so it is important. But are you the code owner and do you approve? So I have to go and start checking because that is the process. In the past few days CODE_OWNERS.TXT on the trunk has been changing while 3.2 has been stable, I work on 3.2 branch so I have sent couple of e-mails to wrong people. Anyway, it was not my intention to cause message storm and this is...

I just got back from Boston where we completed testing of the TE410P for FCC, Euro, and Australian approvals, and I'm happy to say we passed all our approvals (including Q.921 and Q.931 layers, i.e. libpri as well as surges) for both telco and leased line applications. Hopefully we'll have the official documents soon, but I know there are a lot of you out there that are happy to hear

nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on the APL, only RedHat and SuSE

Hi, I am considering installing several `servers' in a facility that needs to conform with the products listed at: DSD Approved Products http://www.dsd.gov.au/infosec/evaluation_services/epl/dap.html As far as i can see freebsd performs above and beyond, for all the required criteria in the act. Can we see freebsd listed as an approved product in the near future? Best Regards, Jason - RF & CO

...mailing list posting: List: Syslinux at zytor.com From: dev-owner at dpdk.org Subject: Your message to dev awaits moderator approval Reason: Post by non-member to a members-only list At your convenience, visit: http://www.zytor.com/mailman/admindb/syslinux to approve or deny the request. Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 07:24:51 +0100 From: dev-owner at dpdk.org To: syslinux at zytor.com Subject: Your message to dev awaits moderator approval Your mail to 'dev' with the subject status Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The...

...problems you are seeing? > > Here is what happens. > > I get a message "could you please include/add/merge this r16xxxx into > 3.2?". And my immediate reaction is sure, no problem this fixes > PR/issue/crash so it is important. But are you the code owner > and do you approve? So I have to go and start checking because > that is the process. In the past few days CODE_OWNERS.TXT > on the trunk has been changing while 3.2 has been stable, > I work on 3.2 branch so I have sent couple of e-mails > to wrong people. > > Anyway, it was not my intention to cau...

...ocess. > The developer policy states: > "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get > approval, submit a patch > <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits > <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you > may commit it yourself." > > Do I have to send the patch to llvm-commits via email and wait for > approval even when the patch has been accepted in the reviews (i.e. > Phabricator) ? > > > > Approval via Phabricator is fine. LLVM-commits (or the relevant sub...

I have started to read r-help on Gmane using Thunderbird as a reader. Before that I had messages sent to gmail account. The first post through Gmane needed moderator approval, but then I got a message from Your friendly autoauthorizer at Gmane.org saying You are now authorized to post to the gmane.comp.lang.r.general newsgroup. But my messages are still needing moderator approval, which I

Hi, I am no longer accepting new patch nominations for the 3.6.1 branches. There are a handful of outstanding patches waiting for approval from code owners, I may still merge these if I get code owner approval before the start of 'official' testing. We had originally planed to start 'official' testing today, however a regression was found in the 3.6 branch, so I would like to

...to acheive approval for use in Australia within the next 2 months ? (when is the end of summer?). Once this is done, it will certainly suit larger installations, but it still leaves a number of 'gaps'. Anyone with analog phone lines will need either X101P or similar, or else an Australian approved channel bank. Since the X101P isn't approved, and doesn't appear to be approved soon, the chances of getting a Australian approved channel bank at a decent price is likely low. Again, with smaller offices (say 15 or less extensions) the price of a TE400P card is too expensive, will there...

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 07:44:20PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 26 Nov 2014, at 16:50, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote: > ... > > I will try to look at the patches today. I'm going to delay the release a week > > or so, because of all the merge requests I've received,

...terpreting the answers. Some comments mentioned "if a review spawns a related change", which to me is a different review, and I've reviewed many of those cases. Most people use the Phab link to express relationship, but that's not a series. Others said "some patches may be approved before others" which only works in a series if they're from start to N, not N to M, nor M to the end, nor randomly approved. In this case, the series is split in two, with the latter having to be rebased on patches committed after the first part is, so essentially, creating a new series....

On 4/28/2015 9:49 AM, bobby Orellano wrote: > nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on > the APL, only RedHat and SuSE DoD approval requires spending lots of money jumping through arbitrary hoops. Do you wish to pay for this? skimming the requirements, it also requires extensive documentation of said 'Product'. Do you wish to write th...

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, syslinux-bounces at zytor.com wrote: > Your mail to 'SYSLINUX' with the subject > > Re: [syslinux] Syslinux keyboard mappings > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you

...I have the following data, summarizing approval ratings on two different surveys for a random sample of 1600 individuals: > ## Example: Ratings of prime minister (Agresti, Table 12.1, p.494) > rating <- matrix(c(794, 86, 150, 570), 2, 2) > dimnames(rating) <- list(First = c("approve", "disapprove"), + Second = c("approve", "disapprove")) > rating Second First approve disapprove approve 794 150 disapprove 86 570 I would like to fit a logit model with approve/disappro...

On 11/17/2012 6:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > >> I think that the code owner process is becoming complicated and I am not sure if it serves Chris's original intent. I don't think that we need to change every file nor do we need an automatic tool to find the owner. I think that a simple text