Yes it is. Download it and look at the LICENSE file. It is the GPL. As for the
zapatel cards, all materials needed to manufacture the cards are online. They
too are under GPL.
"The better you look the more you will see." - Ms. Lidia
Gene
-----Original Message-----
From: d hinton [mailto:hint63@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 6:21 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CE certification for Europe
FIRST LET ME STATE AGAIN I'M NOT A TROLL! my small company would like to
support the asterisk effort, but can't or won't pay a $800 markup. now,
please go to the http://zapatatelephony.org/ website and do some reading!
the pci card was their last card released, BY THEM not digium, inc. these
cards was released to benifit the world not individuals that's what GPL is
all about. NOW is asterisk GPL or not. if not then i'll move on, even though
i really like it's potential. i did that before on a GPL firewall project,
that dropped the GPL license, became commercial, and forgot all about the
people who helped do the work.
dwayne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Critchfield" <critch@basesys.com>
To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] CE certification for Europe
> On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 15:32, d hinton wrote:
> > first off the majority of work on the cards was made by zapata guys,
let's> > give them the credit. secondly are you talking about hardward support
or
> > asterisk software support?
>
> I may be a little off, but I'm pretty sure the original was a ISA card
> and is effectively useless in current systems due to lack of ISA slots.
> So the work the original zapata implementers did that is brought forward
> is mostly the software. As I understand, the current PCI cards are more
> than surface mounted hardware, and the fact that is was updated to run
> on a PCI bus must have taken a lot of work. I also know that the one
> person that had been assembling the ISA cards stopped doing it because
> the time spent wasn't worth the money.
>
> > let's deal with drivers first: the original was released by zapata
guy's
as> > GLP'ed software and any derivertive of that work sould also be
GPL'ed.
and> > yes we would support any drivers built by us and maybe even some that
are> > not. but that's what open source is about. a group of people
working
> > together to make a piece of software the best it could be.
>
> Drivers built by you? are you planning a fork of the driver, or are you
> refering to a different platform that isn't currently being supported?
>
> > now on to the hardware support; digium provides one hour support with
their> > cards. that would be about $700 per hour for support. thanks but no
thanks.> > times are too hard for those prices :-D
>
> See you drop back to the assumption that the software has no value, and
> the updates have no value. That $700 you quoted gets you an hour of
> phone support, and all the upcoming software updates to the driver and
> possibly a little more priority when asking questions to Mark in an
> online forum. His help has been invaluable for diagnosing problems and
> pointing towards better solutions. Then you can add in the fact that
> Mark can continue for that mutch longer doing asterisk development as
> his job.
>
> BTW, if you think times are too tough for those prices, you are only
> going to contribute to the problem. Port for port, zapata hardware is
> still much more cost effective than other providers of similar hardware
> with no where near the support.
>
> > also we're getting off base here, my intent was NOT to bash digium
for
their> > prices but rather find a way to get people without the huge budget of
a
> > great company like yours, to be able to add to the project in a
meaningful> > way. few can at the current pricing schema, that's why the
original
makers> > sold it at ~$250 USD and released it GPL in the first place. just my
two
>
> The original developers didn't sell them. There was another guy who was
> building them in his spare time and found it wasn't worth doing it.
They
> were not factory built, nor were they warantied.
>
> If you want to be part of the comunity, don't try to undercut the
cards.
> Go after the channel bank market. There is a place where people can be
> undercut quite a bit and still make insane profits. Not to mention
> outside of ebay finds, it is the most expensive part of the roll out of
> a asterisk machine. For my home machine, had it not been for an ebay
> find, I would not have been able to build the asterisk machine for home.
> The card wasn't outside the price range, just the cost of a new channel
> bank.
>
> --
> Steven Critchfield <critch@basesys.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users