hi guys, At the moment there is a www.centos.org site. There is also a wildcard dns setup that directs anything.centos.org to www.centos.org's content This has a couple of 'issues' with SEO and google sepcifically. The reason we have such low page rank is that google marks all of this as duplicate content. I am sure there are other search engines that do as well ( Bing has a policy of marking down duplicates as well ). So, what I'd like to propose is to either drop the wildcard dns completely, or setup a new vhost for the wildcard that isnt www.centos.org. What we could then do is either present people with a list of options on destinations they might be interested in. eg: - www.centos.org - wiki.centos.org - bugs.centos.org - mirror.centos.org - isolist.centos.org thoughts ? -- Karanbir Singh kbsingh at karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Karanbir Singh wrote:> hi guys, > > At the moment there is a www.centos.org site. There is also a wildcard > dns setup that directs anything.centos.org to www.centos.org's content > > This has a couple of 'issues' with SEO and google sepcifically. The > reason we have such low page rank is that google marks all of this as > duplicate content. I am sure there are other search engines that do as > well ( Bing has a policy of marking down duplicates as well ). > > So, what I'd like to propose is to either drop the wildcard dns > completely, or setup a new vhost for the wildcard that isnt > www.centos.org. What we could then do is either present people with a > list of options on destinations they might be interested in. eg: > > - www.centos.org > - wiki.centos.org > - bugs.centos.org > - mirror.centos.org > - isolist.centos.org > > thoughts ? > > >I'd make a dedicatet vhost with the following index.html (read between the lines, please...): Welcome, beloved user ! You've reached nothing.centos.org which unfortunately does not point to valid content. What we can help you with is: - www.centos.org - wiki.centos.org - bugs.centos.org - mirror.centos.org - isolist.centos.org - dev.centos.org Thank you for your interest in CentOS !
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:57 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:> hi guys, > > At the moment there is a www.centos.org site. There is also a wildcard > dns setup that directs anything.centos.org to www.centos.org's content > > This has a couple of 'issues' with SEO and google sepcifically. The > reason we have such low page rank is that google marks all of this as > duplicate content. I am sure there are other search engines that do as > well ( Bing has a policy of marking down duplicates as well ).--- I do not think that's the whole problem: Take into consideration this; site:wiki.centos.org kernelbuild Use that at both bing.com and google.com. Bing wins hands down. BTW when was the last bing crawl date? Today? John
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 15:57 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: I answered my own question Bing crawled it on 4-10 2010! John
From: "Karanbir Singh", Friday, April 16, 2010 8:57 AM> ... > At the moment there is a www.centos.org site. There is also a wildcard > dns setup that directs anything.centos.org to www.centos.org's content > ...Unless I'm missing something, http://yadda.centos.org doesn't redirect, it displays a copy of the (www.)centos.org content. I'm not that knowledgeable about SEO stuff, but wouldn't a redirect be better? Assuming an Apache setup, adding something like a catch-all virtual host after any other centos.org host definitions. I prefer URL's without the www unless there is a good reason... <VirtualHost *:80> ServerAlias *.centos.org Redirect permanent / http://centos.org </VirtualHost> That should get the browser client to notice and change where it is going.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Samba wins eWeek and PC Magazine "Innovation in Infrastructure" (i3) award for best Enterprise Software !
- Samba wins eWeek and PC Magazine "Innovation in Infrastructure" (i3) award for best Enterprise Software !
- panel.abline and xyplot
- Binary Logit Regression with R
- What to do before launching v1.0?