Displaying 20 results from an estimated 70076 matches for "directs".
Did you mean:
direct
2007 Jul 06
0
Branch 'as' - 2 commits - libswfdec/swfdec_as_math.c test/trace
libswfdec/swfdec_as_math.c | 10 +++++++++-
test/trace/Makefile.am | 9 +++++++++
test/trace/round-direction-5.swf |binary
test/trace/round-direction-5.swf.trace | 5 +++++
test/trace/round-direction-6.swf |binary
test/trace/round-direction-6.swf.trace | 5 +++++
test/trace/round-direction-7.swf |binary
2018 May 24
5
[RFC] Formalizing FileCheck Features
Background
----------
FileCheck [0] is a cornerstone testing tool for the LLVM project. It
has grown new features over the years to meet new needs, but these
sometimes have surprising and counter-intuitive behavior [1]. This
has become even more evident in Joel Denny's recent quest to repair
what seemed like an obvious defect [2] but which led me to the
conclusion [3] that FileCheck sorely
2018 May 24
0
[RFC] Formalizing FileCheck Features
On 05/24/2018 08:46 AM, via llvm-dev wrote:
> Background
> ----------
>
> FileCheck [0] is a cornerstone testing tool for the LLVM project. It
> has grown new features over the years to meet new needs, but these
> sometimes have surprising and counter-intuitive behavior [1]. This
> has become even more evident in Joel Denny's recent quest to repair
> what seemed like
2003 Sep 17
2
help jeremy
* compiled from cvs, i am trying call ip phones in callmanager 3.2
10.17.0.2 is my callmanager
i noticed from network dumps that instead of sending rtp to the ip phone, * sends it to 10.17.0.2!
thereby causing no audio from * to ip phone. audio from ip phone to * is ok.
only callmanager calls fail. netmeeting works ok...
here is the debug, thanks for any info
~kelvin
H323 debug enabled
--
2016 Jun 15
2
[PATCH] Fix recognition of keeppxe option
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
> >
> >> > kernel.c:new_linux_kernel() to load_linux.c:bios_boot_linux() because
> >> > there is no convenient way in new_linux_kernel() to control the boot
> >> > flags value.
> >>
> >> This is the part that has me questioning things and trying
2018 Jun 14
3
[RFC] Formalizing FileCheck Features
A few replies, then I'll post a revised spec v2 which ought to incorporate all the other feedback. If I missed something, give a shout.
Actually, I wish there were a way to do that [constrain DAG to a single line] for the sake of matching unordered text on a single line. SAME after DAGs is as close as I can get to that. Maybe we need a CHECK-DAG-SAME.
Hmmm. You know, there were cases
2008 Jul 15
1
code reduction (if anyone feels like it)
# I am sure that I could be more efficient than this but how? Thanks in
advance.
#GPS in Decimal Degrees in the form longitude latitude
RM215 <- matrix(c(-82.1461363, 33.5959109), nrow=1)
SC <- matrix(c(-82.025888, 33.606454), nrow=1)
RM202 <- matrix(c(-81.9906723, 33.5027653), nrow=1)
RM198 <- matrix(c(-81.926823, 33.4634678), nrow=1)
HC <- matrix(c(-81.920505, 33.46192), nrow=1)
2011 Aug 10
2
[LLVMdev] EQTDDataStructures omits obvious, direct callee from DSCallGraph
Andrew Lenharth wrote:
> If I remember correctly, it only tries to resolve indirect calls. The
> analysis doesn't track direct calls because you can do it just as well
> yourself.
DSCallGraph::callee_begin() and DSCallGraph::callee_end() cooperate to
iterate over an empty set (EmptyActual) for any call site not found in
the ActualCallees map. So if direct calls are not tracked,
2016 Apr 27
4
PXERETRY directive
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
> > Would someone please be so kind to explain / describe the PXERETRY
> > directive?
>
> $ git grep -ni pxeretry
> com32/elflink/ldlinux/readconfig.c:1305: else if (looking_at(p, "pxeretry"))
> com32/elflink/ldlinux/readconfig.c:1306: PXERetry =
>
2016 Jun 10
1
When is PATH directive used?
Ady asked:
> Have you read the "See also" section(s) of the wiki page(s)?
Yes.
> By reading the relevant wiki pages, a user should (_hopefully_) get to
> the conclusion that the PATH directive is relevant for c32 modules, and
> not a replacement for the CONFIG / INCLUDE directives nor for relative
> paths based on the "Working Directory".
There's nothing
2016 Jun 14
2
[PATCH] Fix recognition of keeppxe option
> > kernel.c:new_linux_kernel() to load_linux.c:bios_boot_linux() because
> > there is no convenient way in new_linux_kernel() to control the boot
> > flags value.
>
> This is the part that has me questioning things and trying to recall
> if any other KERNEL-like directives ever utilize keeppxe.
>
@Gene,
Not being a developer myself, I don't understand this
2016 Aug 06
4
CFI error with binutils 2.27
Hi,
:If I compile this file with debugging enabled (clang/LLVM TOT)
int main()
{
}
I get the error
Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections
From the 2.27 binutils assemblers. It seems that 2.27 doesn't like the
.cfi_sections .debug_frame
directive following previous .cfi directives. The assemblers seem to be
happy if the .cfi_sections directive precedes any other .cfi directive.
Is
2020 Oct 12
2
[RFC] Analysis and runtime check of objc_direct/objc_non_runtime_protocol
Currently diagnostics related to objc_direct/objc_non_runtime_protocol are
done at each compilation unit. Even with these diagnostics, we will see
issues at runtime
- Due to lack of global scope for our diagnostics. We can catch these
issues with a global analysis.
- Due to usages of dynamic APIs that require the metadata. We can catch
these issues with runtime checks. Builds with
2019 Jul 25
2
SMB Direct support?
Hello all, I was reading up on SMB Direct support and it seems very interesting. I looked through slides of a presentation by Stefan Metzmacher about SMB Direct last year:
https://www.samba.org/~metze/presentations/2018/SDC/StefanMetzmacher_SDC2018-SMB-Direct-Status-rev1-presentation.pdf
I was wondering what the current support of of SMB Direct for Samba.
I have a Windows 10 Pro for Workstations
2006 Apr 10
3
timeAlign
I use POSIXct for datetimes. Is thee a timeAlign function that I can
use where :
align by year
direction -1 ==> start of this year
direction 1 ==> start of next year
align by week
direction -1 ==> date on last sunday
direction 1 ==> date on next sunday
align by day
direction -1 ==> time at past midnight
direction 1 ==> time at this comming
2014 Dec 18
2
PATH directive
I have a question about the PATH directive. In fact, the question is
not about how it is currently working, but about its intention or goal,
or how it was supposed to work (or how it was thought about for the
5.00 release).
Previous discussions about the PATH directive in the Syslinux Mailing
List, and its documentation (e.g. "PATH rules") left on me the
impression that it was
2011 Aug 11
0
[LLVMdev] EQTDDataStructures omits obvious, direct callee from DSCallGraph
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Ben Liblit <liblit at cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
> Andrew Lenharth wrote:
>> If I remember correctly, it only tries to resolve indirect calls. The
>> analysis doesn't track direct calls because you can do it just as well
>> yourself.
>
> DSCallGraph::callee_begin() and DSCallGraph::callee_end() cooperate to
> iterate over an empty
2006 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] print .weak directives
The attached patch makes the AsmPrinter emit one .weak directive for
each weak global variable that is referenced at least once in a global
table. It uses a std::set to print only one directive.
Thoughts?
Best Regards,
Rafael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: llvm.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2945 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2009 Jul 14
4
Trig functions strange results
I am trying to calculate coordinate transformations and in the process of debugging my code using debug I found the following
Browse[1]> direction[i]
[1] -1.570796
Browse[1]> cos(direction[i])
[1] 6.123032e-17
Browse[1]> cos(-1.570796)
[1] 3.267949e-07
Browse[1]> direction[i]
[1] -1.570796
Browse[1]> cos(direction[i])
[1] 6.123032e-17
Browse[1]> cos(-1.570796)
[1] 3.267949e-07
2018 Jan 16
2
Exception handling support for a target
2018-01-16 18:18 GMT+08:00 Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>:
> On 15 January 2018 at 12:49, 陳韋任 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> wrote:
> > - CFI directives:
> >
> > This is for .eh_frame section. Basically all the targets insert CFI
> > directives in FrameLowering, but I am not sure exactly when/where I
> should
> > do