R 2.8.1 is packaged up and queued up for testing. Please test this out: Fedora 9: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc9,R-2.8.1-1.fc9 Fedora 10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc10,R-2.8.1-1.fc10 Once you've tested it, please, please, go to the update URL above and click "Add A Comment". If it works for you, click "Works for me" and write a little bit about how you tested it. That counts as a "+1" of karma for that update. When it gets to +3, the system automatically flags the update to be pushed to stable. You don't have to specifically test rpy to give karma on the update, I have a high degree of confidence in rpy continuing to work. Thanks in advance, ~spot
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:> R 2.8.1 is packaged up and queued up for testing. Please test this out: > > Fedora 9: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc9,R-2.8.1-1.fc9 > Fedora 10: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpy-1.0.3-6.fc10,R-2.8.1-1.fc10 > > Once you've tested it, please, please, go to the update URL above and > click "Add A Comment". If it works for you, click "Works for me" and > write a little bit about how you tested it. That counts as a "+1" of > karma for that update. When it gets to +3, the system automatically > flags the update to be pushed to stable. > > You don't have to specifically test rpy to give karma on the update, I > have a high degree of confidence in rpy continuing to work.Er, I don't think you can be sure that everyone knows the magic incantations... Is this it? yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update R but, first we need to wait for the package to move from pending to testing, right? -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
Pierre-Yves wrote: [...]>>> >>> It has not pushed to testing yet, but here are the URLs for the updated >>> builds: >>> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-2.8.1-2.fc9 >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-2.8.1-2.fc10[...]>> Hmm... >> >> Package R-devel-2.8.1-2.fc9.i386.rpm is not signed >> >> Is this to be expected? >> > From Koji build yes it is :) > > Regards, > > PierreSuspected so, but better safe than sorry... Looks like it works now (Tom has fixed the Omega issue at the same time as the mu, I see ;-) ) -p -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918 ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907