Zhao, Yunfeng
2007-Apr-16 02:28 UTC
[Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 block issue
We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 hang when we destroy a XenU guest. Block issue 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 Thanks Yunfeng _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2007-Apr-16 04:00 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 block issue
By XenU, do you mean this is a PV (not HVM) guest? If you have a serial line connected to the test machine, can you try pressing the ''d'' debug key and post the output? -- Keir On 16/4/07 03:28, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote:> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 hang when we destroy > a XenU guest. > Block issue > 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 > > Thanks > Yunfeng > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Zhao, Yunfeng
2007-Apr-16 05:31 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 block issue
Yes, I meant a PV guest. The serial output is in the attachment Thanks Yunfeng>-----Original Message----- >From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk] >Sent: 2007年4月16日 12:01 >To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 block >issue > >By XenU, do you mean this is a PV (not HVM) guest? > >If you have a serial line connected to the test machine, can you try >pressing the ''d'' debug key and post the output? > > -- Keir > >On 16/4/07 03:28, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote: > >> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 hang when we destroy >> a XenU guest. >> Block issue >> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >> >> Thanks >> Yunfeng >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Zhao, Yunfeng
2007-Apr-16 08:11 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 blockissue
One new issue about IA32e SMP guest has been found: IA32e SMP guest can only boot up one virtual processor even though two or more vcpus has been enabled in hvm config file. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=965>-----Original Message----- >From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Zhao, Yunfeng >Sent: 2007年4月16日 10:28 >To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 blockissue > > We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 hang when we destroy >a XenU guest. >Block issue >1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 > >Thanks >Yunfeng > >_______________________________________________ >Xen-devel mailing list >Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Cui, Dexuan
2007-Apr-16 08:58 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 blockissue
Hi Keir, I just posted a patch that can fix the bug. -- Dexuan -----Original Message----- From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Zhao, Yunfeng Sent: 2007年4月16日 13:31 To: Keir Fraser; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 blockissue Yes, I meant a PV guest. The serial output is in the attachment Thanks Yunfeng>-----Original Message----- >From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk] >Sent: 2007年4月16日 12:01 >To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 block >issue > >By XenU, do you mean this is a PV (not HVM) guest? > >If you have a serial line connected to the test machine, can you try >pressing the ''d'' debug key and post the output? > > -- Keir > >On 16/4/07 03:28, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote: > >> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 hang when we destroy >> a XenU guest. >> Block issue >> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >> >> Thanks >> Yunfeng >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2007-Apr-16 10:55 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 blockissue
What type of xenU guest (e.g., Linux, Windows, both)? Do you have boot output from the guest (it''s easy to configure a Linux guest to send its boot output to /dev/ttyS0, and then you can pick it up via ''xm console'')? How recently did HVM SMP guest boot work okay for you with ia32e Xen? -- Keir On 16/4/07 09:11, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote:> One new issue about IA32e SMP guest has been found: > IA32e SMP guest can only boot up one virtual processor even though two or more > vcpus has been enabled in hvm config file. > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=965 > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Zhao, Yunfeng >> Sent: 2007年4月16日 10:28 >> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> Subject: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 blockissue >> >> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 hang when we destroy >> a XenU guest. >> Block issue >> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >> >> Thanks >> Yunfeng >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Li, Xin B
2007-Apr-16 14:30 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1blockissue
Both x86_32/64 Linux guests can only boot one cpu, while vista 32 guest can boot with 2 CPUs. Log attached. -Xin>-----Original Message----- >From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser >Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:56 PM >To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >14854 - 1blockissue > >What type of xenU guest (e.g., Linux, Windows, both)? Do you have boot >output from the guest (it''s easy to configure a Linux guest to >send its boot >output to /dev/ttyS0, and then you can pick it up via ''xm >console'')? How >recently did HVM SMP guest boot work okay for you with ia32e Xen? > > -- Keir > >On 16/4/07 09:11, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote: > >> One new issue about IA32e SMP guest has been found: >> IA32e SMP guest can only boot up one virtual processor even >though two or more >> vcpus has been enabled in hvm config file. >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=965 >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >Zhao, Yunfeng >>> Sent: 2007年4月16日 10:28 >>> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>> Subject: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >14854 - 1 blockissue >>> >>> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 >hang when we destroy >>> a XenU guest. >>> Block issue >>> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >>> >>> Thanks >>> Yunfeng >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-devel mailing list >>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > >_______________________________________________ >Xen-devel mailing list >Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Li, Xin B
2007-Apr-16 14:59 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 -1blockissue
I misconfigured 32 guest with only 1 vcpu, acturally 32 Linux boots fine when configured with 2 vcpus. The bug is on 64 bit guest side only, both windows Vista 64 gives a blue screen with bug check # 0x5C (HAL_INITIALIZATION_FAILED), Linux can only boot with UP. -Xin>-----Original Message----- >From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Li, Xin B >Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:30 PM >To: Keir Fraser; Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >14854 -1blockissue > >Both x86_32/64 Linux guests can only boot one cpu, while vista >32 guest can boot with 2 CPUs. >Log attached. >-Xin > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >Keir Fraser >>Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:56 PM >>To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>14854 - 1blockissue >> >>What type of xenU guest (e.g., Linux, Windows, both)? Do you have boot >>output from the guest (it''s easy to configure a Linux guest to >>send its boot >>output to /dev/ttyS0, and then you can pick it up via ''xm >>console'')? How >>recently did HVM SMP guest boot work okay for you with ia32e Xen? >> >> -- Keir >> >>On 16/4/07 09:11, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> One new issue about IA32e SMP guest has been found: >>> IA32e SMP guest can only boot up one virtual processor even >>though two or more >>> vcpus has been enabled in hvm config file. >>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=965 >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >>Zhao, Yunfeng >>>> Sent: 2007年4月16日 10:28 >>>> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>14854 - 1 blockissue >>>> >>>> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 >>hang when we destroy >>>> a XenU guest. >>>> Block issue >>>> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Yunfeng >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-devel mailing list >>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Xen-devel mailing list >>Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >> >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2007-Apr-16 15:42 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 -1blockissue
Any idea with which changeset this problem appeared? -- Keir On 16/4/07 15:59, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@intel.com> wrote:> I misconfigured 32 guest with only 1 vcpu, acturally 32 Linux boots fine when > configured with 2 vcpus. > The bug is on 64 bit guest side only, both windows Vista 64 gives a blue > screen with bug check # 0x5C (HAL_INITIALIZATION_FAILED), Linux can only boot > with UP. > -Xin > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Li, Xin B >> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:30 PM >> To: Keir Fraser; Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >> 14854 -1blockissue >> >> Both x86_32/64 Linux guests can only boot one cpu, while vista >> 32 guest can boot with 2 CPUs. >> Log attached. >> -Xin >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >> Keir Fraser >>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:56 PM >>> To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>> 14854 - 1blockissue >>> >>> What type of xenU guest (e.g., Linux, Windows, both)? Do you have boot >>> output from the guest (it''s easy to configure a Linux guest to >>> send its boot >>> output to /dev/ttyS0, and then you can pick it up via ''xm >>> console'')? How >>> recently did HVM SMP guest boot work okay for you with ia32e Xen? >>> >>> -- Keir >>> >>> On 16/4/07 09:11, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>>> One new issue about IA32e SMP guest has been found: >>>> IA32e SMP guest can only boot up one virtual processor even >>> though two or more >>>> vcpus has been enabled in hvm config file. >>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=965 >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >>> Zhao, Yunfeng >>>>> Sent: 2007年4月16日 10:28 >>>>> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>> 14854 - 1 blockissue >>>>> >>>>> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 >>> hang when we destroy >>>>> a XenU guest. >>>>> Block issue >>>>> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >>>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Yunfeng >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-devel mailing list >>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>> >>_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Li, Xin B
2007-Apr-16 15:46 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 -1blockissue
I''m checking now. -Xin>-----Original Message----- >From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk] >Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:43 PM >To: Li, Xin B; Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >14854 -1blockissue > >Any idea with which changeset this problem appeared? > > -- Keir > >On 16/4/07 15:59, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@intel.com> wrote: > >> I misconfigured 32 guest with only 1 vcpu, acturally 32 >Linux boots fine when >> configured with 2 vcpus. >> The bug is on 64 bit guest side only, both windows Vista 64 >gives a blue >> screen with bug check # 0x5C (HAL_INITIALIZATION_FAILED), >Linux can only boot >> with UP. >> -Xin >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >Li, Xin B >>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:30 PM >>> To: Keir Fraser; Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>> 14854 -1blockissue >>> >>> Both x86_32/64 Linux guests can only boot one cpu, while vista >>> 32 guest can boot with 2 CPUs. >>> Log attached. >>> -Xin >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >>> Keir Fraser >>>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:56 PM >>>> To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>>> 14854 - 1blockissue >>>> >>>> What type of xenU guest (e.g., Linux, Windows, both)? Do >you have boot >>>> output from the guest (it''s easy to configure a Linux guest to >>>> send its boot >>>> output to /dev/ttyS0, and then you can pick it up via ''xm >>>> console'')? How >>>> recently did HVM SMP guest boot work okay for you with ia32e Xen? >>>> >>>> -- Keir >>>> >>>> On 16/4/07 09:11, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> One new issue about IA32e SMP guest has been found: >>>>> IA32e SMP guest can only boot up one virtual processor even >>>> though two or more >>>>> vcpus has been enabled in hvm config file. >>>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=965 >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >>>> Zhao, Yunfeng >>>>>> Sent: 2007年4月16日 10:28 >>>>>> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>>> 14854 - 1 blockissue >>>>>> >>>>>> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 >>>> hang when we destroy >>>>>> a XenU guest. >>>>>> Block issue >>>>>> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >>>>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Yunfeng >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>>> >>> >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2007-Apr-16 15:48 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 -1blockissue
I wonder if the mmio decoder changes could have anything to do with it? I wouldn''t be surprised if there''s some fallout from those as they seemed fairly significant. -- Keir On 16/4/07 16:42, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:> Any idea with which changeset this problem appeared? > > -- Keir > > On 16/4/07 15:59, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@intel.com> wrote: > >> I misconfigured 32 guest with only 1 vcpu, acturally 32 Linux boots fine when >> configured with 2 vcpus. >> The bug is on 64 bit guest side only, both windows Vista 64 gives a blue >> screen with bug check # 0x5C (HAL_INITIALIZATION_FAILED), Linux can only boot >> with UP. >> -Xin >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Li, Xin B >>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:30 PM >>> To: Keir Fraser; Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>> 14854 -1blockissue >>> >>> Both x86_32/64 Linux guests can only boot one cpu, while vista >>> 32 guest can boot with 2 CPUs. >>> Log attached. >>> -Xin >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >>> Keir Fraser >>>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:56 PM >>>> To: Zhao, Yunfeng; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>>> 14854 - 1blockissue >>>> >>>> What type of xenU guest (e.g., Linux, Windows, both)? Do you have boot >>>> output from the guest (it''s easy to configure a Linux guest to >>>> send its boot >>>> output to /dev/ttyS0, and then you can pick it up via ''xm >>>> console'')? How >>>> recently did HVM SMP guest boot work okay for you with ia32e Xen? >>>> >>>> -- Keir >>>> >>>> On 16/4/07 09:11, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> One new issue about IA32e SMP guest has been found: >>>>> IA32e SMP guest can only boot up one virtual processor even >>>> though two or more >>>>> vcpus has been enabled in hvm config file. >>>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=965 >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of >>>> Zhao, Yunfeng >>>>>> Sent: 2007年4月16日 10:28 >>>>>> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset >>>> 14854 - 1 blockissue >>>>>> >>>>>> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 >>>> hang when we destroy >>>>>> a XenU guest. >>>>>> Block issue >>>>>> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >>>>>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Yunfeng >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Xen-devel mailing list >>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel >>>> >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Keir Fraser
2007-Apr-16 16:50 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 blockissue
Hopefully fixed by r14863. -- Keir On 16/4/07 09:11, "Zhao, Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@intel.com> wrote:> One new issue about IA32e SMP guest has been found: > IA32e SMP guest can only boot up one virtual processor even though two or more > vcpus has been enabled in hvm config file. > http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=965 > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com >> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Zhao, Yunfeng >> Sent: 2007年4月16日 10:28 >> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> Subject: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14854 - 1 blockissue >> >> We meet a block issue in today''s nightly testing. Xen0 hang when we destroy >> a XenU guest. >> Block issue >> 1) xen0 hang when destroying a XenU guest >> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=963 >> >> Thanks >> Yunfeng >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Apparently Analagous Threads
- vmx status report against changeset 14887 - No new issue, 3 old issues
- vmx status report against changeset 14797 - 4 old issues
- VMX status report 10680:f692a0a476c5
- Problem bringing up 32-bit Sles 9 on a Dom-VT
- [PATCH] pciback: restore PCI BARs on D3->D0 transition