Xen users - Mar 2010 - unstable 4.0 config file/ build error

Hi,
 
The unstable repository seems to be quite unstable even building the image... !!
I see:
 

make[4]: Entering directory `/foo/xen-unstable.hg/tools/libxl''
gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -m64 -g
-fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused-value
-Wdeclaration-after-statement  -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .xl.o.d 
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE  -I. -fPIC -I../../tools/libxc
-I../../tools/include -I../../tools/libxc -I../../tools/include
-I../../tools/xenstore -I../../tools/include -c xl.c
flex --header-file=libxlu_cfg_l.h --outfile=libxlu_cfg_l.c libxlu_cfg_l.l
flex: unknown flag ''-''.  For usage, try
        flex --help
make[4]: *** [libxlu_cfg_l.c] Error 1

libxl > flex --header-file=libxlu_cfg_l.h --outfile=libxlu_cfg_l.c
libxlu_cfg_l.l
flex: unknown flag ''-''.  For usage, try
        flex --help


libxl > flex -V
flex version 2.5.4

 
Any suggestions ?
 
Thanks !

SV
 

 


      

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On 06/03/2010 01:35, "ccmail111" <ccmail111@yahoo.com> wrote:
> libxl > flex -V
> flex version 2.5.4
>  
> Any suggestions ?
This is fixed already.

 K.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 05:35:46PM -0800, ccmail111
wrote:
>    Hi,
> 
>    The unstable repository seems to be quite unstable even building the
>    image... !!
>    I see:
> 
>    make[4]: Entering directory `/foo/xen-unstable.hg/tools/libxl''
>    gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -m64 -g
>    -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
>    -Wno-unused-value -Wdeclaration-after-statement  -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD
-MF
>    .xl.o.d  -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE  -I. -fPIC
>    -I../../tools/libxc -I../../tools/include -I../../tools/libxc
>    -I../../tools/include -I../../tools/xenstore -I../../tools/include -c
xl.c
>    flex --header-file=libxlu_cfg_l.h --outfile=libxlu_cfg_l.c
libxlu_cfg_l.l
>    flex: unknown flag ''-''.  For usage, try
>            flex --help
>    make[4]: *** [libxlu_cfg_l.c] Error 1
>    libxl > flex --header-file=libxlu_cfg_l.h --outfile=libxlu_cfg_l.c
>    libxlu_cfg_l.l
>    flex: unknown flag ''-''.  For usage, try
>            flex --help
> 
>    libxl > flex -V
>    flex version 2.5.4
> 
>    Any suggestions ?
> 
What distribution are you using? xen-unstable builds OK for me with Fedora 12.

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

On 06/03/2010 12:15, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:
>>    flex: unknown flag ''-''.  For usage, try
>>            flex --help
>> 
>>    libxl > flex -V
>>    flex version 2.5.4
>> 
>>    Any suggestions ?
>> 
> 
> What distribution are you using? xen-unstable builds OK for me with Fedora
12.
The flex/bison output is checked into the tree now anyhow, so the problem
won''t manifest unless you modify the flex/bison inputs. Someone
reported
that the RHEL5 flex is too old, which is disappointing.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:00:25 +0000
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>On 06/03/2010 12:15, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi> wrote:
>
>>>    flex: unknown flag ''-''.  For usage, try
>>>            flex --help
>>>
>>>    libxl > flex -V
>>>    flex version 2.5.4
>>>
>>>    Any suggestions ?
>>>
>>
>> What distribution are you using? xen-unstable builds OK for me with
>> Fedora 12.
>
>The flex/bison output is checked into the tree now anyhow, so the
>problem won''t manifest unless you modify the flex/bison inputs.
>Someone reported that the RHEL5 flex is too old, which is
>disappointing.
>
> -- Keir
Yeah and it''s always "deleted" when doing "make
distclean" after
"hg pull -u"


diff -r 2629c6a79d64 tools/libxl/Makefile
--- a/tools/libxl/Makefile      Mon Mar 08 19:11:47 2010 +0000
+++ b/tools/libxl/Makefile      Mon Mar 08 20:41:18 2010 +0100
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
 .PHONY: clean
 clean:
        $(RM) -f *.o *.so* *.a $(CLIENTS) $(DEPS)
-       $(RM) -f $(AUTOSRCS) $(AUTOINCS)
+#      $(RM) -f $(AUTOSRCS) $(AUTOINCS)

 distclean: clean


##
##################################################################
# Position   : Systems Design Technician @ OSRC                  #
# Email      : conny.seidel@amd.com  GnuPG-Key: 0xA6AB055D       #
# Fingerprint: 17C4 5DB2 7C4C C1C7 1452 8148 F139 7C09 A6AB 055D #
##################################################################


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Conny Seidel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] unstable 4.0 config file/ build
error"):
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:00:25 +0000
> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> >The flex/bison output is checked into the tree now anyhow, so the
> >problem won''t manifest unless you modify the flex/bison
inputs.
> >Someone reported that the RHEL5 flex is too old, which is
> >disappointing.
> 
> Yeah and it''s always "deleted" when doing "make
distclean" after
> "hg pull -u"
I guess we need a "realclean" or "maintainer-clean" too but
I don''t
fancy draining this particular swamp right now.
> -       $(RM) -f $(AUTOSRCS) $(AUTOINCS)
> +#      $(RM) -f $(AUTOSRCS) $(AUTOINCS)
I see this has gone in.

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel