Stephan von Krawczynski
2009-Sep-08 10:04 UTC
[Gluster-users] The continuing story ... YAU (Yet Another Update)
Hello all, as we have something like a pseudo-stable base for testing (1 client, 1 server) we tried some performance enhancement, therefore added the following to the client setup: volume cache type performance/io-cache option cache-size 64MB option priority *.cfg:3,*:1 # option cache-timeout 2 subvolumes writebehind end-volume If we do that the client goes crazy within around 3 hours. We could not save the logs for that because it produced around 4 GB of it and we could not save the setup without deleting it. As you can see we also use writebehind, so maybe its a combined problem. Without writebehind we cannot test the setup because it becomes very slow and the runtime of our scripts does not fit into a 5 mins slot. -- Regards, Stephan