Centos CSGFS is at this time really outdated compared to current rh updates and fixes, is the centos team still giving support to this version???. Best regards
Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes wrote:> Centos CSGFS is at this time really outdated compared to current rh > updates and fixes, is the centos team still giving support to this > version???.What are you missing? GFS-kernel-2.6.9-80.9.el4_7.5.src.rpm is the latest kernel which is available on ftp.redhat.com - and I think we have that. Last change is from November 2008 on ftp.redhat.com. Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090114/ed08e550/attachment-0003.sig>
Not sure about that: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/csgfs/i386/RPMS/?C=M;O=A Last change in centos is from 12-Sep-2008 In centos mirror: GFS-kernel-2.6.9-80.9.i686.rpm 30-Jul-2008 15:59 218K Wich is built against an outdated redhat kernel. A mirror problem??? Best regards> What are you missing?> GFS-kernel-2.6.9-80.9.el4_7.5.src.rpm is the latest kernel which is > available on ftp.redhat.com - and I think we have that. Last change is >from November 2008 on ftp.redhat.com.Cheers, Ralph ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes <alietsantiesteban at gmail.com> Date: 2009/1/14 Subject: csgfs 4 really outdated To: centos at centos.org Centos CSGFS is at this time really outdated compared to current rh updates and fixes, is the centos team still giving support to this version???. Best regards
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Sync csgfs in centos 4 with current kernel updates
- Sync of csgfs and current centos 4 updates
- Local node indexes in a cluster backend with GFS2
- Dovecot imaptest on RHEL4/GFS1, RHEL6/GFS2, NFS and local storage results
- Is Dovecot Director stable for production??