I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice. The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git? The only other general patches before the Xen series I have left in my queue are: i386-common-smp.patch i386-fix-voyager-build.patch vsyscall-note-use-elfnote_h.patch I obviously don't depend the voyager patch, but I tweaked it a bit to apply to the current git tree. How is your patch queue looking now? Is there much left? J
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 10:21 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:> I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like > almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice. > > The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and > the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your > sched_clock patch or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the > paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git? > > The only other general patches before the Xen series I have left in my > queue are: > > i386-common-smp.patch > i386-fix-voyager-build.patch > vsyscall-note-use-elfnote_h.patchJust make sure it's the one I sent you, not your original one ... the original one won't compile on voyager. Since voyager is now completely broken in mainline (again) do you want me to take these through the voyager tree? James -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: i386-common-smp.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 9587 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20070506/4356db2e/i386-common-smp.bin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: i386-fix-voyager-build.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 7467 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20070506/4356db2e/i386-fix-voyager-build.bin
On Sunday 06 May 2007 19:21:17 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:> I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git. Looks like > almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice. > > The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and > the sched_clock paravirt-op. Are there still problems with either your > sched_clock patchThere were problems with my patch and yours dependend on it so I deferred both.> or the paravirt patch? Should I resubmit the > paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git?Not needed, I still have it.> The only other general patches before the Xen series I have left in my > queue are: > > i386-common-smp.patch > i386-fix-voyager-build.patch > vsyscall-note-use-elfnote_h.patch > > I obviously don't depend the voyager patch, but I tweaked it a bit to > apply to the current git tree. > > How is your patch queue looking now? Is there much left?Only a few patches left, like unwinder, vDSO, sched-clock. -Andi
Seemingly Similar Threads
- paravirt_ops queue rebased
- [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op
- [PATCH/RFC] replace get_scheduled_cycles with sched_clock paravirt_op
- [RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 13/17] paravirt_ops - time updates
- [RFC/PATCH PV_OPS X86_64 13/17] paravirt_ops - time updates