Charles Marcus
2009-Mar-20 19:13 UTC
[Dovecot] Single Instance Storage still on the roadmap?
Hey Timo, I was curious where Single Instance Storage fits in on the roadmap, now that you are maybe settled in in your new digs... Is it still coming soon? Has it been pushed back by your new employers priorities? Its real high on mine, so if has been back-burnered, I'll need to start looking for alternatives... Thanks, -- Best regards, Charles
Timo Sirainen
2009-Mar-20 19:24 UTC
[Dovecot] Single Instance Storage still on the roadmap?
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 15:13 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:> I was curious where Single Instance Storage fits in on the roadmap, now > that you are maybe settled in in your new digs...What's your use case? People mailing 10 MB pdfs to everyone at company.com, or just reducing disk usage because random people receive the same attachment at different times?> Is it still coming soon? Has it been pushed back by your new employers > priorities?Multi-msgs-per-file dbox is getting close to ready. Adding single instance storage to it probably wouldn't be a huge job, but I don't think it's a very high priority. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090320/e0c7b6ab/attachment-0002.bin>
Charles Marcus
2009-Mar-20 20:38 UTC
[Dovecot] Single Instance Storage still on the roadmap?
On 3/20/2009 3:24 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:>> I was curious where Single Instance Storage fits in on the roadmap, now >> that you are maybe settled in in your new digs...> What's your use case? People mailing 10 MB pdfs to everyone at company.com, > or just reducing disk usage because random people receive the same > attachment at different times?Both. We get emails from vendors that contain large (sometimes 30 or 40MB) PDFs, and they send them to 5 or 50 of our employees. The employees then will email them back and forth, or send them to different people outside the company, sometimes many times. I spent a few hours doing a random audit of someones mail store (with them sitting there with me), and found cases where the same 40MB attachment existed 20 or more times, most of them in the Sent folder, but often with copies in different client folders. Our users are dumb...>> Is it still coming soon? Has it been pushed back by your new employers >> priorities?> Multi-msgs-per-file dbox is getting close to ready. Adding single > instance storage to it probably wouldn't be a huge job, but I don't > think it's a very high priority.Ok, thanks for the update, even though its not what I wanted to hear... :)