Kugutsumen
2007-Oct-26 07:55 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
# zfs list ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded! To download the full ZFS read/write kext with all functionality enabled, please go to http://developer.apple.com no datasets available Unfortunately, I can''t find it on ADC yet and it seems that it was removed by Apple: "Another turn in the Apple-ZFS saga. Apple has made available a developer preview of ZFS for Mac OS X with read/write capability. The preview is available to all ADC members. From the readme file: "ZFS is a new filesystem from Sun Microsystems which has been ported by Apple to Mac OS X. The initial (10.5.0) release of Leopard will restrict ZFS to read-only, so no ZFS pools or filesystems can be modified or created. This Developer Preview will enable full read/write capability, which includes the creation/destruction of ZFS pools and filesystems." Update: Will it ever end? The release has been pulled from ADC by Apple." I can''t wait to reformat all my external 2.5 drives with zfs. This message posted from opensolaris.org
Peter Woodman
2007-Oct-26 12:14 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
it would seem that the reason that it''s been pulled is that it''s installed by default in the release version (9A581) - just tested it here, and willikers, it works! On 10/26/07, Kugutsumen <kugutsumen at kugutsumen.com> wrote:> # zfs list > ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded! > To download the full ZFS read/write kext with all functionality enabled, > please go to http://developer.apple.com > no datasets available > > Unfortunately, I can''t find it on ADC yet and it seems that it was removed by Apple: > > "Another turn in the Apple-ZFS saga. Apple has made available a developer preview of ZFS for Mac OS X with read/write capability. The preview is available to all ADC members. From the readme file: "ZFS is a new filesystem from Sun Microsystems which has been ported by Apple to Mac OS X. The initial (10.5.0) release of Leopard will restrict ZFS to read-only, so no ZFS pools or filesystems can be modified or created. This Developer Preview will enable full read/write capability, which includes the creation/destruction of ZFS pools and filesystems." Update: Will it ever end? The release has been pulled from ADC by Apple." > > I can''t wait to reformat all my external 2.5 drives with zfs. > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
Peter Woodman
2007-Oct-26 12:20 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
err, apologies, i''d like to retract my last comment - i failed reading comprehension. just read-only by default. On 10/26/07, Peter Woodman <peter at shortbus.org> wrote:> it would seem that the reason that it''s been pulled is that it''s > installed by default in the release version (9A581) - just tested it > here, and willikers, it works! > > On 10/26/07, Kugutsumen <kugutsumen at kugutsumen.com> wrote: > > # zfs list > > ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded! > > To download the full ZFS read/write kext with all functionality enabled, > > please go to http://developer.apple.com > > no datasets available > > > > Unfortunately, I can''t find it on ADC yet and it seems that it was removed by Apple: > > > > "Another turn in the Apple-ZFS saga. Apple has made available a developer preview of ZFS for Mac OS X with read/write capability. The preview is available to all ADC members. From the readme file: "ZFS is a new filesystem from Sun Microsystems which has been ported by Apple to Mac OS X. The initial (10.5.0) release of Leopard will restrict ZFS to read-only, so no ZFS pools or filesystems can be modified or created. This Developer Preview will enable full read/write capability, which includes the creation/destruction of ZFS pools and filesystems." Update: Will it ever end? The release has been pulled from ADC by Apple." > > > > I can''t wait to reformat all my external 2.5 drives with zfs. > > > > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > > _______________________________________________ > > zfs-discuss mailing list > > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > >
Andy Lubel
2007-Oct-26 13:10 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
Yeah im pumped about this new release today.. such harmony in my storage to be had. now if OSX only had a native iscsi target/initiator! -Andy Lubel -----Original Message----- From: zfs-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Woodman Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 8:14 AM To: Kugutsumen Cc: zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS it would seem that the reason that it''s been pulled is that it''s installed by default in the release version (9A581) - just tested it here, and willikers, it works! On 10/26/07, Kugutsumen <kugutsumen at kugutsumen.com> wrote:> # zfs list > ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded! > To download the full ZFS read/write kext with all functionality > enabled, please go to http://developer.apple.com no datasets available > > Unfortunately, I can''t find it on ADC yet and it seems that it wasremoved by Apple:> > "Another turn in the Apple-ZFS saga. Apple has made available adeveloper preview of ZFS for Mac OS X with read/write capability. The preview is available to all ADC members. From the readme file: "ZFS is a new filesystem from Sun Microsystems which has been ported by Apple to Mac OS X. The initial (10.5.0) release of Leopard will restrict ZFS to read-only, so no ZFS pools or filesystems can be modified or created. This Developer Preview will enable full read/write capability, which includes the creation/destruction of ZFS pools and filesystems." Update: Will it ever end? The release has been pulled from ADC by Apple."> > I can''t wait to reformat all my external 2.5 drives with zfs. > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Scott Laird
2007-Oct-26 16:31 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
My copy hasn''t arrived yet, but look in the file menu in Disk Utility. http://thinksecret.com/archives/leopard9a377a/source/25.html Scott On 10/26/07, Andy Lubel <andy.Lubel at gtsi.com> wrote:> > Yeah im pumped about this new release today.. such harmony in my > storage to be had. now if OSX only had a native iscsi target/initiator! > > > -Andy Lubel > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: zfs-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org > [mailto:zfs-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter Woodman > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 8:14 AM > To: Kugutsumen > Cc: zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly > ZFS > > it would seem that the reason that it''s been pulled is that it''s > installed by default in the release version (9A581) - just tested it > here, and willikers, it works! > > On 10/26/07, Kugutsumen <kugutsumen at kugutsumen.com> wrote: > > # zfs list > > ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded! > > To download the full ZFS read/write kext with all functionality > > enabled, please go to http://developer.apple.com no datasets available > > > > Unfortunately, I can''t find it on ADC yet and it seems that it was > removed by Apple: > > > > "Another turn in the Apple-ZFS saga. Apple has made available a > developer preview of ZFS for Mac OS X with read/write capability. The > preview is available to all ADC members. From the readme file: "ZFS is a > new filesystem from Sun Microsystems which has been ported by Apple to > Mac OS X. The initial (10.5.0) release of Leopard will restrict ZFS to > read-only, so no ZFS pools or filesystems can be modified or created. > This Developer Preview will enable full read/write capability, which > includes the creation/destruction of ZFS pools and filesystems." Update: > Will it ever end? The release has been pulled from ADC by Apple." > > > > I can''t wait to reformat all my external 2.5 drives with zfs. > > > > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > > _______________________________________________ > > zfs-discuss mailing list > > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20071026/513a93bc/attachment.html>
Kugutsumen
2007-Oct-26 16:53 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
''Connect to iSCSI'' is also missing from the final build 9A58. They might enable it later or maybe there is some undocumented preference settings to enable it. strings * |grep -i iscsi iSCSIConfigurationMenuItem iSCSIController configureiSCSI: Also a lot the NIB files also have mention of iSCSI. On 26/10/2007, at 11:31 PM, Scott Laird wrote:> My copy hasn''t arrived yet, but look in the file menu in Disk Utility. > > http://thinksecret.com/archives/leopard9a377a/source/25.html > > > Scott > > On 10/26/07, Andy Lubel <andy.Lubel at gtsi.com> wrote: Yeah im pumped > about this new release today.. such harmony in my > storage to be had. now if OSX only had a native iscsi target/ > initiator! > > > -Andy Lubel > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: zfs-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org > [mailto:zfs-discuss-bounces at opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Peter > Woodman > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 8:14 AM > To: Kugutsumen > Cc: zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a > readonly > ZFS > > it would seem that the reason that it''s been pulled is that it''s > installed by default in the release version (9A581) - just tested it > here, and willikers, it works! > > On 10/26/07, Kugutsumen <kugutsumen at kugutsumen.com> wrote: > > # zfs list > > ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded! > > To download the full ZFS read/write kext with all functionality > > enabled, please go to http://developer.apple.com no datasets > available > > > > Unfortunately, I can''t find it on ADC yet and it seems that it was > removed by Apple: > > > > "Another turn in the Apple-ZFS saga. Apple has made available a > developer preview of ZFS for Mac OS X with read/write capability. The > preview is available to all ADC members. From the readme file: "ZFS > is a > new filesystem from Sun Microsystems which has been ported by Apple to > Mac OS X. The initial (10.5.0) release of Leopard will restrict ZFS to > read-only, so no ZFS pools or filesystems can be modified or created. > This Developer Preview will enable full read/write capability, which > includes the creation/destruction of ZFS pools and filesystems." > Update: > Will it ever end? The release has been pulled from ADC by Apple." > > > > I can''t wait to reformat all my external 2.5 drives with zfs. > > > > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > > _______________________________________________ > > zfs-discuss mailing list > > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Krister Joas
2007-Oct-27 07:55 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
On Oct 26, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Kugutsumen wrote:> # zfs list > ZFS Readonly implemntation is loaded! > To download the full ZFS read/write kext with all functionality > enabled, > please go to http://developer.apple.com > no datasets available > > Unfortunately, I can''t find it on ADC yet and it seems that it was > removed by Apple:I downloaded version 1.1 from ADC today so it''s not been pulled. I''ve not tested it yet though. Another related piece of news. It seems they''ve ported the Solaris automounter too. When I did a df I noticed an entry "map auto_home ... /home" and there is a file called /etc/ auto_home. I added an entry for my home directory on my Solaris machine and hey presto, it mounts automatically on the Mac. This is great. Krister
Kugutsumen
2007-Oct-27 08:19 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
It wasn''t there yesterday. They just put it back in the Mac OS X Section of the ADC Download section (http://developer.apple.com free registration) This message posted from opensolaris.org
Joe Richards
2007-Oct-30 12:39 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
I''m also very interested in getting this going, it''s frustrating having Apple ignore what a big selling point for Leopard this is! Kugutsum, could you drop me a line so we can discuss? joe (at) penski {dot} net This message posted from opensolaris.org
Lally Singh
2007-Oct-30 18:52 UTC
[zfs-discuss] Mac OS X 10.5.0 Leopard ships with a readonly ZFS
On 10/30/07, Joe Richards <joe at penski.net> wrote:> I''m also very interested in getting this going, it''s frustrating having Apple ignore what a big selling point for Leopard this is! >Check out the Mac blogosphere. I think Apple''s waiting until ZFS''s got a few more things ironed out. The big concerns seem to be massive bulk I/O for video, maybe more reliability/testing on their part. -- H. Lally Singh Ph.D. Candidate, Computer Science Virginia Tech