> I have and impression that html5 with ogg is not implemented widely in > browsers yet. > I noticed that there is a nice java applet(Cortado) that can do ogg, > but I presume java is harder to install and thus less available than Flash.Actually, the important bit is that older browsers all have Java already installed, and they're generally the ones that need cortado. Monty
html 5 doesn't support live video AFAIK. On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:14 PM, <xiphmont at xiph.org> wrote:>> I have and impression that html5 with ogg is not implemented widely in >> browsers yet. >> I noticed that there is a nice java applet(Cortado) that can do ogg, >> but I presume java is harder to install and thus less available than Flash. > > Actually, the important bit is that older browsers all have Java > already installed, and they're generally the ones that need cortado. > > Monty > _______________________________________________ > Icecast mailing list > Icecast at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >-- "The Linux philosophy is 'Laugh in the face of danger'. Oops. Wrong One. 'Do it yourself'. Yes, that's it."
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Pablo Baena <pbaena at gmail.com> wrote:> html 5 doesn't support live video AFAIK.Interesting. I use it on a regular basis... it's how we're doing videoconferencing in RedHat right now. Is FF just going above and beyond? Monty
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Pablo Baena <pbaena at gmail.com> wrote:> html 5 doesn't support live video AFAIK.HTML5 doesn't have any _specific_ support for live video, as far as I know, but it certainly supports it perfectly ok if you don't care about low latency use-cases. It also depends on what codecs/containers you're using, of course - which HTML5 doesn't specify. If you use Ogg along with, say, theora and vorbis - live video works well. Mike