WAIT A MINUTE. You signed up for this mailing list to write that? -----Original Message----- From: flac-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:flac-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of Dirk Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:51 AM To: flac@xiph.org Subject: [Flac] H A T E What retard did the Flac API? It looks like what CS students do short before they leave university to become consultants. It's bloated beyond all recognition. The Documentation sucks ass. There are no good examples. DO YOU HATE LISTENING TO MUSIC? What retard decided to start EVERYTHING with "FLAC__"? That's obscene! Please compare your shit with the elegant vorbis API and realize how much you suck. Ever heard of "file operations"? I CULTIVATED your whole shit into an analogy of that (see attachment) and still have to figure how to get the bitrates (because of your shitty docs). Face it. Your shit is the definition of bloatware! I know this is hardly a constructive critique but it will take some time before I can give constructive critique about Flac again. Only autoconf is worse than your shit! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 7201 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20060224/6386aff2/smime.bin
On Friday 24 February 2006 09:27, Liggatt, Keanon wrote:> WAIT A MINUTE. > > You signed up for this mailing list to write that?He obviously has emotional issues. He'd rather piss and moan than refactor and recompile the library to get what he wants. It's not like 5 letters is a big deal, and that's coming from someone who has had to work 8-20 hours a day at the keyboard for the past 5 years and needs special pads to avoid RSI. Hal> -----Original Message----- > From: flac-bounces@xiph.org [mailto:flac-bounces@xiph.org] On Behalf Of > Dirk Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 4:51 AM > To: flac@xiph.org > Subject: [Flac] H A T E > > What retard did the Flac API? It looks like what CS students do short > before they leave university to become consultants. > > It's bloated beyond all recognition. The Documentation sucks ass. There are > no good examples. > > DO YOU HATE LISTENING TO MUSIC? > > What retard decided to start EVERYTHING with "FLAC__"? That's obscene! > > Please compare your shit with the elegant vorbis API and realize how much > you suck. > > Ever heard of "file operations"? I CULTIVATED your whole shit into an > analogy of that (see attachment) and still have to figure how to get the > bitrates (because of your shitty docs). > > Face it. Your shit is the definition of bloatware! > > I know this is hardly a constructive critique but it will take some time > before I can give constructive critique about Flac again. > > Only autoconf is worse than your shit!
---- Original Message ---- From: "Hal Vaughan" <hal@thresholddigital.com> To: <flac@xiph.org> Sent: vrijdag 24 februari 2006 16:25 Subject: Re: [Flac] H A T E> On Friday 24 February 2006 09:27, Liggatt, Keanon wrote: > > > WAIT A MINUTE. > > > > You signed up for this mailing list to write that? > > He obviously has emotional issues. He'd rather piss and moan than > refactor and recompile the library to get what he wants. It's not like > 5 letters is a big deal, and that's coming from someone who has had to > work 8-20 hours a day at the keyboard for the past 5 years and needs > special pads to avoid RSI.4 simple words: don't feed the trolls