Matt Zimmerman
2004-Sep-10 16:45 UTC
[Flac-dev] [jonathan.picht@web.de: Bug#133557: flac: --fast and --best switches (as in gzip and bzip2) would be nice]
Sounds simple enough, and would provide clear and explicit descriptions that can be used in place of the numeric options. ----- Forwarded message from Jonathan Picht <jonathan.picht@web.de> ----- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:08:54 +0100 From: Jonathan Picht <jonathan.picht@web.de> Resent-From: Jonathan Picht <jonathan.picht@web.de> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org> Subject: Bug#133557: flac: --fast and --best switches (as in gzip and bzip2) would be nice Package: flac Version: 1.0.2-1 Severity: wishlist hi, subject says it all :) should probably go upstream. jonathan -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux lithium 2.4.17 #1 Son Feb 3 18:47:34 CET 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro Versions of packages flac depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libflac1 1.0.2-1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim ii libogg0 1.0rc3-1 Ogg Bitstream Library ----- End forwarded message ----- -- - mdz
Josh Coalson
2004-Sep-10 16:45 UTC
[Flac-dev] [jonathan.picht@web.de: Bug#133557: flac: --fast and --best switches (as in gzip and bzip2) would be nice]
wish they were all that easy... just checked in the changes. Josh --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:> Sounds simple enough, and would provide clear and explicit > descriptions that > can be used in place of the numeric options. > > ----- Forwarded message from Jonathan Picht <jonathan.picht@web.de> > ----- > > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:08:54 +0100 > From: Jonathan Picht <jonathan.picht@web.de> > Resent-From: Jonathan Picht <jonathan.picht@web.de> > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org> > Subject: Bug#133557: flac: --fast and --best switches (as in gzip and > bzip2) would be nice > > Package: flac > Version: 1.0.2-1 > Severity: wishlist > > hi, > > subject says it all :) > > should probably go upstream. > > jonathan > > -- System Information > Debian Release: 3.0 > Architecture: i386 > Kernel: Linux lithium 2.4.17 #1 Son Feb 3 18:47:34 CET 2002 i686 > Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro > > Versions of packages flac depends on: > ii libc6 2.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared > libraries an > ii libflac1 1.0.2-1 Free Lossless Audio > Codec - runtim > ii libogg0 1.0rc3-1 Ogg Bitstream Library > > > > ----- End forwarded message -----__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com
Matt Zimmerman
2004-Sep-10 16:45 UTC
[Flac-dev] [jonathan.picht@web.de: Bug#133557: flac: --fast and --best switches (as in gzip and bzip2) would be nice]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 03:00:38PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote:> wish they were all that easy... just checked in the changes.Great, thanks. Just to confirm, --best will give the currenty -9 behaviour, not the maybe-best-compression-but-really-really-not-what-you-want that used to be -9, right? (I can't conveniently check CVS from here) -- - mdz
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [jonathan.picht@web.de: Bug#133557: flac: --fast and --best switches (as in gzip and bzip2) would be nice]
- [jonathan.picht@web.de: Bug#133557: flac: --fast and --best switches (as in gzip and bzip2) would be nice]
- [bodrato@gulp.linux.it: Bug#174609: flac: option "-E, --escape-coding" in man page, but not accepted]
- [fsblk@aurora.uaf.edu: Bug#138828: flac: strange decode output]
- ext2fs_read_bb_inode: Invalid argument && Can't read an block bitmap