search for: libogg0

....4.20-presario #1 mar dic 10 11:41:23 CET 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro Versions of packages flac depends on: hi libc6 2.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an hi libflac4 1.0.4-3 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim ii libogg0 1.0.0-1 Ogg Bitstream Library hi liboggflac0 1.0.4-3 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim -- no debconf information ----- End forwarded message ----- -- - mdz

...eb 3 18:47:34 CET 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro Versions of packages flac depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libflac1 1.0.2-1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim ii libogg0 1.0rc3-1 Ogg Bitstream Library ----- End forwarded message ----- -- - mdz

...86) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages flac depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libflac4 1.1.0-11 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim ii libogg0 1.1.0-1 Ogg Bitstream Library ii liboggflac1 1.1.0-11 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list...

...http://www.brain4free.org/wiki/doku.php/blog:streamtranscoderv3_linux_aac_patch However I am trying to install on a Fedora server and the repositories mentioned in the above how-to are for Debian. I'm having difficulty tracking down all the relevant Fedora repos for some of these components: libogg0 libogg-dev libvorbis0a libvorbis-dev liblame0 liblame-dev libfaac0 libfaac-dev libfaad0 libfaad-dev libmad0 libmad0-dev libflac8 libflac-dev automake libtool Ideally I think I'd like to be pointed towards a Fedora repo equivalent to the Debian multimedia one in the example above. A solution m...

...LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro > > Versions of packages flac depends on: > ii libc6 2.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared > libraries an > ii libflac1 1.0.2-1 Free Lossless Audio > Codec - runtim > ii libogg0 1.0rc3-1 Ogg Bitstream Library > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com

...6 Kernel: Linux greenwood 2.4.12 #2 Sat Oct 13 21:11:27 AKDT 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= Versions of packages flac depends on: ii libc6 2.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libflac1 1.0.2-1 Free Lossless Audio Codec - runtim ii libogg0 1.0rc3-1 Ogg Bitstream Library ----- End forwarded message ----- -- - mdz

...'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17 Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libtheora0 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libogg0 1.1.3-2 Ogg Bitstream Library libtheora0 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -------------- next part -------------- --- libtheora-0.0.0.alpha7/lib/toplevel.c 2006-06-13 00:57:36.000000000 +0200 +++ libtheora-pdw/lib/toplevel.c 2006-08-19 16:55:30.000000000...

Anyone know how I can persuade a debian system that a version number like '1.0-1' is actually greater than '1.0rc3-1', for the purpose of dependencies? As the 1.0 debian control file requires debhelper 4.0.0, I ended up building from source, but I'd like to put some equivs packages in without silly version numbers like '1.0rc99' to keep apt and friends happy. John

...oku.php/blog:streamtranscoderv3_linux_aac_patch > > However I am trying to install on a Fedora server and the repositories > mentioned in the above how-to are for Debian. I'm having difficulty > tracking down all the relevant Fedora repos for some of these > components: > > libogg0 libogg-dev libvorbis0a libvorbis-dev liblame0 > liblame-dev libfaac0 libfaac-dev libfaad0 libfaad-dev libmad0 > libmad0-dev libflac8 libflac-dev automake libtool > > Ideally I think I'd like to be pointed towards a Fedora repo > equivalent to the Debian multimedia one in the exam...

...than files made with RC2. I have some example sound file set up for you on the net. The difference is *obvious*. While RC2 made ogg-files, which I would say are perfect (at least I cannot hear a difference to the original), the quality of RC3 is *bad*. Let me first say, that I used libvorbis0, libogg0 and vorbis-tools Debian packages. After I discovered the quality decrease, I compiled the libraries and vorbis-tools from source, both using gcc 2.95.4 and gcc 3.0.3, each of which gave the same result: bad quality. Here's the proof: Original WAV-File (~5MB) http://stud.physik.uni-dortmun...