Richard Sloan
2014-Oct-09 16:13 UTC
[Speex-dev] Speex on M3 for a device for a disabled person to use
I am trying to develop a device for a disabled person and need low bitrate voice, speex looks good, however I need to find optimized M3 code and can not, searched online all over, I use Keil also if that helps. My M3 is 128kbps/64kram 72mhz, i only need to do a encode in one part and decode in another..... Please let me know if you can help this project with a link to optimized code Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20141009/87ae4a18/attachment.htm
Tristan Matthews
2014-Oct-09 17:20 UTC
[Speex-dev] Speex on M3 for a device for a disabled person to use
Hi Richard, On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Richard Sloan <themindfactory at gmail.com> wrote:> I am trying to develop a device for a disabled person and need low bitrate > voice, speex looks good, however I need to find optimized M3 code and can > not, searched online all over, I use Keil also if that helps. > > My M3 is 128kbps/64kram 72mhz, i only need to do a encode in one part and > decode in another..... > > Please let me know if you can help this project with a link to optimized > code >For new projects, we recommend using the Opus Codec ( http://www.opus-codec.org/) which has effectively obsoleted Speex. Best, Tristan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20141009/e26b14ff/attachment.htm
René Schümann
2014-Oct-09 17:28 UTC
[Speex-dev] Speex on M3 for a device for a disabled person to use
Hi Tristan, well... if speed is really his problem (and looking at those 72 MHz it probably is), wouldn't Speek surpass Opus by far? I agree that Opus is way better, but it's sadly also using more resources... But yeah, Richard you should give Opus a try if possible ;) It's generally easier to use then Speex and also more feature rich. Yours sincerely, Ren? Sch?mann *From:* Tristan Matthews <le.businessman at gmail.com> <mailto:%3Ca%3Ele.businessman at gmail.com%3C/a%3E> *Sent:* Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:20:44 -0400 - *To:* Richard Sloan <themindfactory at gmail.com> <mailto:%3Ca%3Ethemindfactory at gmail.com%3C/a%3E> *CC:* speex-dev at xiph.org *Subject:* Re: [Speex-dev] Speex on M3 for a device for a disabled person to use> Hi Richard, > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Richard Sloan > <themindfactory at gmail.com <mailto:themindfactory at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I am trying to develop a device for a disabled person and need low > bitrate voice, speex looks good, however I need to find optimized > M3 code and can not, searched online all over, I use Keil also if > that helps. > > My M3 is 128kbps/64kram 72mhz, i only need to do a encode in one > part and decode in another..... > > Please let me know if you can help this project with a link to > optimized code > > > For new projects, we recommend using the Opus Codec > (http://www.opus-codec.org/) which has effectively obsoleted Speex. > > Best, > Tristan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > Speex-dev at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20141009/c5c4f789/attachment.htm