search for: 3ca

...way better, but it's sadly also using more resources... But yeah, Richard you should give Opus a try if possible ;) It's generally easier to use then Speex and also more feature rich. Yours sincerely, Ren? Sch?mann *From:* Tristan Matthews <le.businessman at gmail.com> <mailto:%3Ca%3Ele.businessman at gmail.com%3C/a%3E> *Sent:* Thu, 9 Oct 2014 13:20:44 -0400 - *To:* Richard Sloan <themindfactory at gmail.com> <mailto:%3Ca%3Ethemindfactory at gmail.com%3C/a%3E> *CC:* speex-dev at xiph.org *Subject:* Re: [Speex-dev] Speex on M3 for a device for a disabled person...

=3Cbody=3E =3Cp class=3D=22MsoNormal=22=3E=3Ci=3E=3Cspan lang=3D=22EN-US=22 style=3D=22font-size=3A 10=2E0pt=3B mso-bidi-font-size=3A 12=2E0pt=22=3E=3Cfont face=3D=22Verdana=22=3Eplease note to send ALL REPLY e-mail direct to me at=3A =3Ca href=3D=22mailto=3AQuestions=40QualityWatchWorld=2Ecom=22=3EQuestions=40QualityWatchWorld=2Ecom=3C=2Fa=3E=3Co=3Ap=3E =3C=2Fo=3Ap=3E =3C=2Ffont=3E=3C=2Fspan=3E=3C=2Fi=3E=3C=2Fp=3E =3Cp class=3D=22MsoNormal=22=3E=3Cspan lang=3D=22EN-US=22=3E=3Cfont face=3D=22Verdana=22=3EHi=2C=3C=2Ffont=3E=3C=2Fspan=...

...get the following information: <1><3c3>: Abbrev Number: 21 (DW_TAG_subprogram) <3c4> DW_AT_external : 1 <3c4> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x23f): main <3c8> DW_AT_decl_file : 1 <3c9> DW_AT_decl_line : 16 <3ca> DW_AT_prototyped : 1 <3ca> DW_AT_type : <0x3f> <3ce> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x4008a0 <3d6> DW_AT_high_pc : 0xe5 <3de> DW_AT_frame_base : 1 byte block: 9c (DW_OP_call_frame_cfa) <3e0> DW_AT_GNU_all_call_sites: 1 &l...

http://babelmark.bobtfish.net/?markdown=%3Ca%2Bb%40c.org%3E&normalize=on Only Python markdown, Pandoc, discount and PEG markdown seem to get this 'right'. As a + is perfectly valid in email addresses, I'm going to fix this in my modules. This was reported to me via the cpan.org RT (37909), and I thought I'd share...

I am trying to develop a device for a disabled person and need low bitrate voice, speex looks good, however I need to find optimized M3 code and can not, searched online all over, I use Keil also if that helps. My M3 is 128kbps/64kram 72mhz, i only need to do a encode in one part and decode in another..... Please let me know if you can help this project with a link to optimized code Thanks!

The card you installed has FXO or FXS modules in it ????? are you getting your lines directly from the telco co??? Doug D On Mon 23/08/10 8:37 AM , Cassius Smith cassius at cassius.org sent: * -----Original Message----- * From: Todd Reese * Reply-to: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion * To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com [3] * Subject: [asterisk-users] Dahdi

Hi, Sorry, made a typo when trying to approve this. Apologies to the sender. Geoff. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:20:06 +0000 From: Ben Edwards - Trinity <ben@3ca.org.uk> To: icecast list <icecast@xiph.org> Subject: status.xsl I have seen some reference to changing status.xsl to only include active mount points. I'me not an xsl hacker. How would one change the default config file to do this? Ben

https://docs.asterisk.org/latest/Configuration/Interfaces/Asterisk-Manager-Interface-AMI/Asterisk-Manager-Interface-AMI-Changes/ On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:54 AM, TTT <[lists at telium.io](mailto:On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:54 AM, TTT <<a href=)> wrote: > Is there a web page that lists the AMI versions mapped to Asterisk versions? > > I noticed that the AMI version increased

...risk-users] AMI versions https://docs.asterisk.org/latest/Configuration/Interfaces/Asterisk-Manager-Interface-AMI/Asterisk-Manager-Interface-AMI-Changes/ On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:54 AM, TTT <lists at telium.io <mailto:On%20Tue,%20Jul%2011,%202023%20at%2011:54%20AM,%20TTT%20%3c%3ca%20href=> > wrote: Is there a web page that lists the AMI versions mapped to Asterisk versions? I noticed that the AMI version increased quickly to 9.0.0. Will the AMI version increase with each Asterisk version increase in the future? Thanks Brian -------------- next part --------...

Estimados usuarios de R: Tengo dos data frames, A y B, donde hay algunas variables comunes y otras distintas. En el A tengo las variables, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5. En el B tengo las variables a1, a2, a3, b1, b2, b3,b4, b5, b6, b7. Los valores llave son a1 y a2, al data frame B quiero pegarle las variables a4 y a5 y en el caso no se tenga ningun valor en la variable a3, ponerle el valor que aparece

ActiveRecord::Base.logger = Logger.new(STDOUT) -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SQL-Queries-in-Rails-Console-%3Ca-href%3D%22sdf%22%3E%3C-a%3E%3Cobject%3E%3C-object%3E-tp30901356p30901356.html Sent from the RubyOnRails Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email t...

..."),     a3 = c("ca", "cb", NA, "cd", "ce"),     b1 = c("1aa", "1ab", "1ac", "1ad", "1ae"),     b2 = c("2ba", "2bb", "2bc", "2bd", "2be"),     b3 = c("3ca", "3cb", "3cc", "3cd", "3ce"),     b4 = c("4aa", "4ab", "4ac", "4ad", "4ae"),     b5 = c("5ba", "5bb", "5bc", "5bd", "5be"),     b6 = c("6ca", &...

...t; 00003980 l F .text 0000009a nonlocal_mentioned_p > 00003a20 l F .text ffffc7f8 nonlocal_referenced_p_1 > -00000598 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.22833 > +00000598 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.22744 > 00003c00 l F .text 0000009a nonlocal_set_p > 00003ca0 l F .text ffffc5a4 nonlocal_set_p_1 > -000005b0 l O .rodata 00000011 __FUNCTION__.22936 > +000005b0 l O .rodata 00000011 __FUNCTION__.22845 > 00000020 l O .bss 000000d4 static_reg_base_value > 0000010c l O .bss 00000001 memory_modified.b > 00003f00 l F .te...

The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the