Peter Boos
2020-Sep-24 14:38 UTC
[Samba] Moving FSMO roles doesnt affect srv records in DNS ?.
Thanks Rowland, I checked again the DNS service. Its still not pointing towards the new DC its Thursday now. While we migrated last Sunday (20-9-2020). Is it a manual action we should do `samba_dnsupdate` Or is it something that's triggered by a cron job ?. I Just want to be be sure its all correctly installed and working. As i would like to migrate the old server away. (As the plan was to replace the old server for 2 new servers). -----Original message-----> From: Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> > Sent: Wednesday 23rd September 2020 15:26 > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Moving FSMO roles doesnt affect srv records in DNS ?. > > On 23/09/2020 12:40, Peter Boos via samba wrote: > > We've added an extra DC for redundancy to the Debian based Active Directory. > > We updated our older smaba version to the current one, and joined a new > DC. > > Then the commands where givven to move all the FSMO roles > > > > Which we verified with "samba-tool fsmo show", which showed that all roles > are on the new DC. > > > > However in DNS all underscore srv records of the AD services still point > to the old server. > > Not sure how samba handels it, though as the virtual pdc emulator is pointing > to the old DNS server. > > The old DC still seams to handle all logon's now. > > As we verified by cmd command set in win 10 clients (showing logon server > as the old dc).. > > ?Is this normal behaviour for Samba, are srv records not updated ?. > > I find it strange and am wondered if our AD is now running as intended. > > > > How to verify Samba. > > This is the way it is supposed to work: Every so often, samba_dnsupdate > is run on a DC, this uses a file 'dns_update_list'. Any missing files > from the list are created. One of the lines from the list is this: > > # The PDC emulator > ${IF_PDC}SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}??????????????????? > ${HOSTNAME} 389 > > I think if you check again, you will now have the required SRV record, > but you may also have another record for the old pdc_emulator role > owner. Whilst it seems there is code to add the _ldap._tcp.pdc record, > there doesn't seem to any to remove it from the old role owner. > > You can remove the incorrect record (if you have it) with 'samba-tool > dns delete' > > Rowland > > > > >
Rowland penny
2020-Sep-24 15:02 UTC
[Samba] Moving FSMO roles doesnt affect srv records in DNS ?.
On 24/09/2020 15:38, Peter Boos via samba wrote:> Thanks Rowland, > I checked again the DNS service. > Its still not pointing towards the new DC its Thursday now. > While we migrated last Sunday (20-9-2020). > Is it a manual action we should do `samba_dnsupdate` > Or is it something that's triggered by a cron job ?. > > I Just want to be be sure its all correctly installed and working. > As i would like to migrate the old server away. > (As the plan was to replace the old server for 2 new servers).Can we see the smb.conf from the DC / Also, do you have the dnsutils package installed ? (this the debian package that contains nsupdate) Rowland
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Moving FSMO roles doesnt affect srv records in DNS ?.
- Moving FSMO roles doesnt affect srv records in DNS ?.
- Unable to "rejoin" existing DC after upgrade (infamous WERR_FILE_NOT_FOUND)
- pdc emulator dns record missing after transferring role
- Policies for AD clients (still poledit only ?).