search for: if_pdc

...ransfer the FSMO role will that be updated then ? On a samba AD DC, the samba_dnsupdate script is run at start up and then every 10 minutes, this script uses a file called dns_update_list and if a required dns record is missing, it is created. One of these records is this: # The PDC emulator ${IF_PDC}SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN} ${HOSTNAME} 389 If you move the PDC emulator role to another DC, the required SRV record will be created, but there is no code to delete the old record. > > The other FSMO roles,??also have / need DNS entries unique to only the machine that h...

...{HOSTNAME} 389 ${IF_RWDC}SRV          _ldap._tcp.${DOMAINGUID}.domains._msdcs.${DNSFOREST}  ${HOSTNAME} 389 ${IF_DC}SRV            _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.${DNSDOMAIN}                ${HOSTNAME} 389 ${IF_DC}SRV            _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.dc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}      ${HOSTNAME} 389 ${IF_PDC}SRV           _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}                    ${HOSTNAME} 389 ${IF_RWGC}SRV          _ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST}                     ${HOSTNAME} 3268 ${IF_GC}SRV            _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.gc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST}      ${HOSTNAME} 3268 ${IF_RWDNS_DOMAIN}SRV  _...

...SFOREST} ${HOSTNAME} > > 389 > > > > ${IF_DC}SRV > > _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.${DNSDOMAIN} > > ${HOSTNAME} 389 > > > > ${IF_DC}SRV > > _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.dc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN} ${HOSTNAME} > > 389 > > > > ${IF_PDC}SRV > > _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN} ${HOSTNAME} > > 389 > > > > ${IF_RWGC}SRV > > _ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST} ${HOSTNAME} > > 3268 > > > > ${IF_GC}SRV > > _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.gc._msdcs....

Hi, Samba: 4.12.0 During the migration from Windows DCs to Samba DCs, the following issue came up: after transferring PDC emulator role to a samba DC, the according DNS record wasn't re-created: # samba-tool fsmo show -d 0 | grep PdcEmulationMasterRole PdcEmulationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS

...; ${IF_RWDC}SRV > _ldap._tcp.${DOMAINGUID}.domains._msdcs.${DNSFOREST}  ${HOSTNAME} 389 > > ${IF_DC}SRV >           _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.${DNSDOMAIN} > ${HOSTNAME} 389 > > ${IF_DC}SRV > _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.dc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}      ${HOSTNAME} 389 > > ${IF_PDC}SRV > _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}                    ${HOSTNAME} 389 > > ${IF_RWGC}SRV > _ldap._tcp.gc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST}                     ${HOSTNAME} 3268 > > ${IF_GC}SRV > _ldap._tcp.${SITE}._sites.gc._msdcs.${DNSFOREST}      ${HOSTNAME} 3268 > > ${IF_RWDN...

...ITIONAL: 0 > > After transferring the PDC role back to Windows DC, the record was re-created. > > Am I missing something here or it's a bug? > Yes and no (well not in the way you are thinking) Yes, you are missing the fact that the dns_update_list has this: # The PDC emulator ${IF_PDC}SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}??????????????????? ${HOSTNAME} 389 If this is the DC with the PDC Emulator role, but doesn't have the required dns record, samba_dnsupdate should create it next time it is run and Samba runs it regularly. No, it isn't a bug, except after checking...

We've added an extra DC for redundancy to the Debian based Active Directory. We updated our older smaba version to the current one, and joined a new DC. Then the commands where givven to move all the FSMO roles Which we verified with "samba-tool fsmo show", which showed that all roles are on the new DC. However in DNS all underscore srv records of the AD services still point to the

...; How to verify Samba. > > This is the way it is supposed to work: Every so often, samba_dnsupdate > is run on a DC, this uses a file 'dns_update_list'. Any missing files > from the list are created. One of the lines from the list is this: > > # The PDC emulator > ${IF_PDC}SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}??????????????????? > ${HOSTNAME} 389 > > I think if you check again, you will now have the required SRV record, > but you may also have another record for the old pdc_emulator role > owner. Whilst it seems there is code to add the _ldap._tcp...

Hai,   Im wondering, im missing the  _ldaps._tcp. INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD entries in my dns. Now, before the updates ( badlock ) etc. this wasnt notice i think. But now since im setting up that everything is doing ldaps i noticed this in my squid setup   ( squid mailing subject : [squid-users] ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl problem )   My question is...   did someone resently setup a new AD

...e came up: >> after transferring PDC emulator role to a samba DC, the according DNS record >> wasn't re-created: >> > Yes and no (well not in the way you are thinking) > Yes, you are missing the fact that the dns_update_list has this: > # The PDC emulator > ${IF_PDC}SRV _ldap._tcp.pdc._msdcs.${DNSDOMAIN}??????????????????? > ${HOSTNAME} 389 I don't miss it. I've checked dns_update_list before writing, which made me thinking there's a bug here along with the fact that after switching the role back to Windows DC the pdc record has appear...