Hello all, For your information, below are some "bugs" (possible optimizations?), all related, for tinc's initialization in systemd. Since both RedHat and Debian recent distros have switched to systemd,**please** make sure that a solid initialization mechanism is included in precompiled .rpm and .deb packages (CentOS, Debian, Fedora, etc.) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261717https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373704https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394512https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues/133 Thanks a lot for the excellent work, Răzvan -------------- partea următoare -------------- Un ataşament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20161117/6f51c524/attachment-0001.html>
Sorry, it seems Gmail have wrecked the format of the links: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261717 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373704 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394512 https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues/133 Răzvan -------------- partea următoare -------------- Un ataşament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20161117/bf0f78be/attachment.html>
Maybe Matching Threads
- A FAQ: is it mandatory to include the local IP address classes in the global VPN address class?
- A FAQ: is it mandatory to include the local IP address classes in the global VPN address class?
- tinc initialization (in both Red Hat and Debian families)
- tinc initialization (in both Red Hat and Debian families)
- Centos 5.3 -> Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....