search for: partea

...packages (CentOS, Debian, Fedora, etc.) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261717https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373704https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394512https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues/133 Thanks a lot for the excellent work, Răzvan -------------- partea următoare -------------- Un ataşament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20161117/6f51c524/attachment-0001.html>

...PN name (say "vpn1") in the /etc/sysconfig/tinc and the corresponding /etc/tinc/vpn1 directory As for the tinc.service file itself, a good start would be, IMHO: https://leesjohn.wordpress.com/2013/03/13/how-to-automatically-start-tinc-on-fedora-17/ Best regards, R?zvan -------------- partea urm?toare -------------- Un ata?ament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20150925/60e665e2/attachment.html>

Guus Sliepen wrote: > Yes, you can do that as well. Note that in router mode, you have to then > provide two Subnets in each host config file; one for that node's > 192.168.x.* address, and another for its 10.* address range. Thank you, it works great! Răzvan -------------- partea următoare -------------- Un ataşament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20170908/163a52ff/attachment.html>

...nc.conf So I thought one may use /etc/sysconfig/tinc instead. Of course, this has the disadvantage of being Red Hat-specific; it would be *great* to have, for that role, a configuration file that resides in a common place, for both Red Hat and Debian families. Best regards, R?zvan -------------- partea urm?toare -------------- Un ata?ament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20150925/e5acc85f/attachment.html>

...aces would solve the problem until an updated Quagga package will offer a more elegant solution, via the now missing "ip ospf area" command. CentOS alone has this problem, all other main distros I've tested already include newer Quagga packages). Thanks a lot, Răzvan -------------- partea următoare -------------- Un ataşament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20170907/f5ec6552/attachment.html>

...o I "inject" tinc routes in OSPF and vice-versa? Should the tinc virtual NETWORK interface participate in a Quaga/OSPF process, together with the other physical Ethernet private interfaces? How should /etc/tinc/NETWORK/tinc-up look like in such cases? Thanks a lot, R?zvan -------------- partea urm?toare -------------- Un ata?ament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20151001/c1d5f410/attachment.html>

...hat the situation is no better in soon-to-be Fedora 23 (already beta stage, final will be available in October). Please see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078237 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261717 Thanks a lot! Best & friendly regards, R?zvan -------------- partea urm?toare -------------- Un ata?ament HTML a fost eliminat URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20150924/c0a1e0d1/attachment.html>

Guys, apache cpus usage is hitting 100% sometimes ( to such an extent that its very noticeable) on a box with just 8 users or so. i m getting this when i run 'top'. The worrying thing is seeing the work 'atack' under command PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 23119 apache 15 0 964 556 472 S 0.7 0.0 0:03.68 atack 23479 apache 15