similar to: Bugs related to tinc's initialization in systemd

Hello, Since the present tinc documentation is not very clear about this, please explain the following: is it mandatory to include the local IP address classes in the global VPN address class? Namely, please consider the following setup (which works great in practice): 1. A tinc VPN, full mesh, with n nodes (n > 3) 2. tinc runs on the firewall, which is also the default gateway for each

Guus Sliepen wrote: > Yes, you can do that as well. Note that in router mode, you have to then > provide two Subnets in each host config file; one for that node's > 192.168.x.* address, and another for its 10.* address range. Thank you, it works great! Răzvan -------------- partea următoare -------------- Un ataşament HTML a fost eliminat URL:

Hello all, Thank you for tinc, that is an **excellent** and useful package! Taking into account that both Red Hat and Debian (8.x) families now use systemd, there is, IMHO, one small. but important correction to be done: tinc's initialization. IMHO, we need: 1. A proper tinc.service file, included by default (prepackaged) in the stock .deb and .rpm packages in Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu,

Hello again, >From the point of view of a Red Hat *user*, the standardised way of doing things would be to have an /etc/sysconfig/tinc file containing something like: NETWORKS="vpn1 vpn2 vpn3" (one or more names separated by spaces) At initialization, each name should launch a separate tinc instance (a different VPN) tinc service should not start until the user adds at least

Guys, apache cpus usage is hitting 100% sometimes ( to such an extent that its very noticeable) on a box with just 8 users or so. i m getting this when i run 'top'. The worrying thing is seeing the work 'atack' under command PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 23119 apache 15 0 964 556 472 S 0.7 0.0 0:03.68 atack 23479 apache 15

La 25.09.2015 13:00, tinc-request at tinc-vpn.org a scris: > Unfortunately, this is not something that maps well to systemd. It would > require a systemd to run a script that parses the sysconfig file and > start all the tinc daemons. Systemd will then put all those daemons in > the same control group and won't recognize something is wrong if only > one of the daemons fail. So

Hello, Please tell me if it's possible to use tinc together with OSPF (instead of static routes in LAN). By OSPF I mean Quagga's GNU/Linux daemon. Namely, I have a group of LANs (private 192.168.x.0/24 each). Each LAN has a GNU/Linux default gateway, 192.168.x.1, that also connects to the Internet via a public IP address (does NAT and firewall for the LAN "behind" it). tinc

Hi everyone! I have a data frame with 1112 time series and I am going to randomly sampling r samples for z times to compose different portfolio size(r securities portfolio). As for r=2 and z=10000,that's: z=10000 A=seq(1:1112) x1=sample(A,z,replace =TRUE) x2=sample(A,z,replace =TRUE) M=cbind(x1,x2) # combination of 2 series Because in a portfolio with x1[i]=x2[i],(i=1,2,...,10000) means a 1

Hello, Please excuse my (probably newbie) question, but: Since RouterOS, MikroTik's proprietary OS, is largely based on GNU/Linux, anyone knows a way to run tinc on a MikroTik device? This would be in order to make an (imposed, no choice given...) MikroTik device (say the B1100AHX4 router) to participate in a tinc mesh, in interoperation with GNU/Linux machines. Please see:

AUGHHHHH I accidentally sent that message below before changing my from address to jason+tinclist@truedesign.com ... now my "real" address is on http://mail.nl.linux.org/tinc/2003-07/maillist.html where it is just begging to be harvested by spambots looking for addresses to add to their spam lists. I've tried so hard to keep my address spam free for a long time (and I've been

Dear developers, I am interested in understanding in more details how tinc's metaprotocol works. I apologize in advance if this was already described somewhere, I could not find it in the mailing list archive. So let's say machine A has a Address= ip.b.example and manages to contact server B via the meta connection. 1) Then B's tinc daemon will send to A edge and subnet

Hi there! I'm totally new to the concept 'self-made VPNs' :P I've discovered tinc and I think it's not as easy as hamachi, but not so hard as OpenVPN :D Now: I've got 4 questions: question n.1: I'm behind a router. This router is configurable, but I'm also behind a provider's NAT (private IPs with a common public IP). Will tinc work, or it will do as

Hi all, hi Guus, in july 2004 i received an e-mail from you concerning the way a packet takes across a (tinc)vpn: > They are forwarded from eth0 to tap0, but the kernel doesn't know that > tinc is forwarding them from tap0 to ippp0. So, the UDP and TCP > packets that tinc sends will be seen by the OUTPUT chain instead of > the FORWARD chain. At the other end, the received UDP

Hi. As I wrote some days ago (It worked! [Was: my two hosts don't see each other]) I succeeded at setting up a tinc VPN between two hosts (isivirtual and pamvirtual) I tried to ping from pamvirtual, the external machine, to an internal IP of 'isivirtual' but it doesn't work. Neither 'traceroute'. What's going on? At 'isivirtual' routing (ip forwarding) is

Hello everybody. I'm a (quite) happy WINE user, but i would like to propose some things to the WINE developers. Something important imo, is that it must be easy to use for the user, and some things could be better, here are some ideas to improve it by using Winecfg: 1. Add an option to disable/enable/edit debug channels for all programs. As you may know, a lot of programs runs faster

One work-around would be to create a hidden share that only Domain Admins can access. The use "force user=root" on that share. Then you'll be able to change ACL's and not be root. Josh > -----Original Message----- > From: Tanstaafl [mailto:tanstaafl_bh@netzero.net] > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 1:36 PM > To: 'Samba List' > Subject: Re: [Samba] Changing