Quoting Daniel Miller <dmiller at amfes.com>:
> I've been re-thinking my backup strategy - I wanted to see what
> input others have.? At this time - I'm using sdbox as the primary
> storage format and running on a single server.
>
> Previously, all my backups were simple filesystem backups. Either
> inotify-based or cron-based.? The whole mail folder structure would
> then be copied to a remote storage site.? I've changed services - I
> now use OpenDrive for the remote storage and can access the remote
> drive as a mounted folder via WebDAV.? I also now use a cron-based
> series of restic jobs for the backup processing.
>
> Because I have some large folders - both personal & business letters
> going back quite some time as well as mailing list archives - some
> mail folders can be quite sizable.? Now I'm wondering, between
> sdbox's support for alternate locations and the ability to use
> different storage formats via namespaces - perhaps I should setup
> archive folders that are stored differently to improve backup
> performance.? Maybe maildir or even mbox for the archive folders - I
> create one per year?
>
> Any comments?? Experiences?
>
> -- Daniel
IMHO, Maildir ontop of zfs.? But anything ontop of zfs will solve it.
zfs Snapshot for local 'backups', zfs send to remote server for real
backup.
Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20180814/0716a814/attachment.html>