Hello, I don't find any indication, that no btrfs for then filesystem for the path in "mail_attachment_dir" is to be used. but btrfs has a big problem with hard links in the same directory. Nuisance is the only deal with a different file system? Hardy
On Qua, 25 Fev 2015, Hardy Flor wrote:> I don't find any indication, that no btrfs for then filesystem for > the path in "mail_attachment_dir" is to be used. but btrfs has a big > problem with hard links in the same directory.According to [0] (and the links in there), this problem has been long solved. [0]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#File_system_tree -- Eduardo M KALINOWSKI eduardo at kalinowski.com.br
I have posted this in the German-debian forum: https://debianforum.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=154096 The result was that it still does not work. I have the kernel with version 3.13.33> According to [0] (and the links in there), this problem has been long > solved. > > [0]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs#File_system_tree >
Am 25.02.2015 um 12:24 schrieb Hardy Flor:> I don't find any indication, that no btrfs for then filesystem for the > path in "mail_attachment_dir" is to be used. but btrfs has a big problem > with hard links in the same directory. > Nuisance is the only deal with a different file system?Btrfs is still nowhere near production ready in 2015. If you want to run a server, which should be reliable, use ext4 oder maybe XFS instead. Or ZFS, if you need a COW. If you are feeling adventurous, then use btrfs.
Apparently Analagous Threads
- btrfs for mail_attachment_dir
- mail-migration with dovadm sync/backup and mail_attachment_dir
- mdbox with mail_attachment_dir per user in 2.2.12
- How to Delete an user and Purge attachements with a common directory mail_attachment_dir with SIS for all users.
- mdbox-files over 2 MB