> I am guessing that because CentOS releases only every 3-5 years, > people forget how much work is done at the beginning of every release. > First there is a lack of packages available. Then there is the > complaining that the OS is useless because it doesn't have ABC. Then > there is finding the people who are challenged enough by the lack of > packages to go learn how to package up stuff and make it available. > Then there is a section where packages get uniform and together. Then > things pretty much stay at that until the next CentOS major release... > people either decide they want to skip to the next or just wait it > out. > > So currently we are in the finding out the lack of packages and the > complaining stage. The real challenge will be finding the people who > see that as a challenge versus a show-stopper and do the next steps. >Surely this is exactly what the SIGs and CentOS Stream are for: developing and contributing to the forthcoming releases of RHEL/CentOS. If Mate or whatever is so important to you, then get involved in the relevant SIG - which in this case is probably https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AlternativeDesktop personally, and I know this seems a bit heretic around here, but I actually like Gnome. P.
On 9/25/19 7:30 AM, Pete Biggs wrote:> >> I am guessing that because CentOS releases only every 3-5 years, >> people forget how much work is done at the beginning of every release. >> First there is a lack of packages available. Then there is the >> complaining that the OS is useless because it doesn't have ABC. Then >> there is finding the people who are challenged enough by the lack of >> packages to go learn how to package up stuff and make it available. >> Then there is a section where packages get uniform and together. Then >> things pretty much stay at that until the next CentOS major release... >> people either decide they want to skip to the next or just wait it >> out. >> >> So currently we are in the finding out the lack of packages and the >> complaining stage. The real challenge will be finding the people who >> see that as a challenge versus a show-stopper and do the next steps. >> > Surely this is exactly what the SIGs and CentOS Stream are for: > developing and contributing to the forthcoming releases of RHEL/CentOS. > If Mate or whatever is so important to you, then get involved in the > relevant SIG - which in this case is probably > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AlternativeDesktop > > personally, and I know this seems a bit heretic around here, but I > actually like Gnome.Ding, Ding, ding, Ding .. Right Answer! If you want it ... package and build it when building on 8 becomes available via CBS to SIGs. Should be early next week. Community part of CentOS is available for you to get involved in a SIG and build whatever you want to build. The question is ,, is someone going to do it. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20190925/bf10da37/attachment-0002.sig>
> > If you want it ... package and build it when building on 8 becomes > available via CBS to SIGs. Should be early next week.With the new initiative CentOS and Fedora Stream, wouldn't it be easier collaborate with Fedora SIGs to bring an updated version of Mate to CentOS> and build whatever you want to build. The question is ,, is someone > going to do it.I am not an expert here, I am very happy with GNOME but if there is anyone that will like to kick off the alternate desktop count me in. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 488 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20190925/4fea05f2/attachment-0002.sig>