Given all the vendors that provide this service with both Windows and Linux clients, Code42 is the only one I am aware of that supports sets. For me, this was essential to prioritize urgent data over low risk changes in the event a disaster occurs while a large directory is taking days to upload. I would use sets with priorities and any changed data that was important would interrupt data of negligible importance. This worked well, however Code42 always bothered me as the software delivery was low quality on Linux, it was a tar file and only implemented sysv scripts and they did not have a cli interface. I worked around this as long as I could until they retooled the app based on electron and as bad as the ui was, it got worse. At this point I would rather switch vendors. Anyone know of another that meets the criteria, from what I can see it doesn't look like any support sets? Thanks, jlc
Le 17/12/2017 ? 19:07, Joseph L. Casale a ?crit?:> Given all the vendors that provide this service with both Windows and > Linux clients, Code42 is the only one I am aware of that supports sets. > For me, this was essential to prioritize urgent data over low risk changes > in the event a disaster occurs while a large directory is taking days to > upload. I would use sets with priorities and any changed data that was > important would interrupt data of negligible importance. > > This worked well, however Code42 always bothered me as the software > delivery was low quality on Linux, it was a tar file and only implemented > sysv scripts and they did not have a cli interface. I worked around this as > long as I could until they retooled the app based on electron and as bad > as the ui was, it got worse. > > At this point I would rather switch vendors. Anyone know of another that > meets the criteria, from what I can see it doesn't look like any support sets?Can't say about Windows clients, but for all my Linux machines, I'm using Rsnapshot, either on public or LAN servers. Basically uses rsync over SSH, with incremental snapshots. I have yet to find a better backup solution. https://blog.microlinux.fr/rsnapshot-centos/ Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32
Data Sun, 17 Dec 2017 20:52:03 +0100 Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> napisa?(a):> Can't say about Windows clients, but for all my Linux machines, I'm > using Rsnapshot, either on public or LAN servers. Basically uses rsync > over SSH, with incremental snapshots. I have yet to find a better > backup solution. > > https://blog.microlinux.fr/rsnapshot-centos/Thanks, it seems to be a really good app. :) I might use it for my local network backups. -- ?ukasz Posadowski
-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 12:52 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Offsite hosted backup solutions> Can't say about Windows clients, but for all my Linux machines, I'm > using Rsnapshot, either on public or LAN servers. Basically uses rsync > over SSH, with incremental snapshots. I have yet to find a better backup > solution. > > https://blog.microlinux.fr/rsnapshot-centos/I know of rsync, and the variants. We rolled an entire solution at a previous gig with it which meant we had to implement daemons, schedules and all the related infra. I could almost justify it except I need offsite storage that I don?t want to also manage in addition to.