m.roth at 5-cent.us
2016-May-06 18:36 UTC
[CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID
Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted the system. And the stupid annoying alarm started up as the system came up. This time, having *finally* figured out how to set up hot spares from the WebBIOS, I suspended the fast initialization, and brought the system up. Googling, I can't find a command to continue the initialization. Anyone know of one, or is what I want to do rebuild the RAID? mark
John R Pierce
2016-May-06 18:40 UTC
[CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID
On 5/6/2016 11:36 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the > firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 or > 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted the > system. > > And the stupid annoying alarm started up as the system came up. > > This time, having*finally* figured out how to set up hot spares from the > WebBIOS, I suspended the fast initialization, and brought the system up. > > Googling, I can't find a command to continue the initialization. Anyone > know of one, or is what I want to do rebuild the RAID?MegaCli64, which has to be installed. the command lines are awful. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
m.roth at 5-cent.us
2016-May-06 20:14 UTC
[CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID
John R Pierce wrote:> On 5/6/2016 11:36 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the >> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 >> or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted >> the system. >> >> And the stupid annoying alarm started up as the system came up. >> >> This time, having*finally* figured out how to set up hot spares from >> the WebBIOS, I suspended the fast initialization, and brought the >> system up. >> >> Googling, I can't find a command to continue the initialization. Anyone >> know of one, or is what I want to do rebuild the RAID? > > MegaCli64, which has to be installed. >That's what I'm using.> the command lines are awful.!$ += 500 mark
Valeri Galtsev
2016-May-06 21:08 UTC
[CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID
On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:36 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the > firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 or > 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and rebooted the > system. > > And the stupid annoying alarm started up as the system came up. > > This time, having *finally* figured out how to set up hot spares from the > WebBIOS, I suspended the fast initialization, and brought the system up. > > Googling, I can't find a command to continue the initialization. Anyone > know of one, or is what I want to do rebuild the RAID?I agree with what John said about their command line interface MegaCli. One thing I have noticed about LSI MegaRaids is: if you hot replace bad drive with good one of the same size or larger (which doesn't have on it traces of being configured in any raid, not necessarily LSI), then the drive is accepted as replacement member into the same volume group, and array gets rebuilt in background automagically. You may want to check first if it is on its way rebuilding already. Valeri> > mark++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
m.roth at 5-cent.us
2016-May-06 21:19 UTC
[CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID
Valeri Galtsev wrote:> > On Fri, May 6, 2016 1:36 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Got a new box I'm trying to set up. I configured the RAID from the >> firmware, but "fast initialize" was sitting there at 0% (it's about 43 >> or 45TB). The first time I tried this, I said background, and >> rebooted the system. >> >> And the stupid annoying alarm started up as the system came up. >> >> This time, having *finally* figured out how to set up hot spares from >> the WebBIOS, I suspended the fast initialization, and brought thesystem up. <snip>> I agree with what John said about their command line interface MegaCli. > One thing I have noticed about LSI MegaRaids is: if you hot replace badTrust me, I've been cursing that interface for years now.> drive with good one of the same size or larger (which doesn't have on it > traces of being configured in any raid, not necessarily LSI), then the > drive is accepted as replacement member into the same volume group, and > array gets rebuilt in background automagically. You may want to check > first if it is on its way rebuilding already.Yeah, I checked with parted, and saw the full size, so then I thought to check the status of the RAID, and it said it was optimal, which I guess means it finished the fast initialization. Partitioned it, built an XFS filesystem, and it's mounted. Has *ANYONE* at LSI/AVAGO *ever* had anyone other than the folks who wrote the code (or maybe that was Dilbert, himself) try to *use* it? mark
Dear Experts, one of the RAID threads today prompted me ask everybody. Which internal hardware RAID controllers will survive some future to come in your estimate. First of all my beloved 3ware finally seems to have passed away. After multiple acquisitions and becoming part of LSI and getting bought with LSI, it probably became non operational. Namely, the latest 3ware cards have ancient firmware. Neither of them supports 4kn drives. This speaks for itself for me. [Under new ownership] LSI, though still having new controllers released, and one of their MegaRAID controllers (at least) having support for 4kn drives, still may not last long (just my feeling, I'd like to hear yours). So, what RAID controllers will those of us who like to have hardware RAIDs use in some future to come? Valeri PS I didn't mention Areca (I only have 2 or 3 their cards in my boxes), which seems to have firmware update that supports 4kn drives. Is Areca our future hardware RAID hardware? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Joseph L. Casale
2016-May-06 22:39 UTC
[CentOS] OT: hardware: MegaCli and initializing a RAID
> I agree with what John said about their command line interface MegaCli.It's not that bad, the cli is incredibly detailed so it's just vast. It's not any different in complexity from hpacu in my opinion.> One thing I have noticed about LSI MegaRaids is: if you hot replace bad > drive with good one of the same size or larger (which doesn't have on it > traces of being configured in any raid, not necessarily LSI), then the > drive is accepted as replacement member into the same volume group, and > array gets rebuilt in background automagically.That behavior is configurable, again it's a matter of environment if that make sense for you. jlc