As the topic has been coming up in other projects recently (for example, see https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-ci/-/merge_requests/39), should we update our files to either add SPDX tags, or even outright condense our existing copyright blurbs down to an SPDX tag plus documentation in a top-level file? The former (adding a line) is less problematic, the latter definitely requires buy-in from all contributors (although the list of contributors is relatively small, so it might be easy enough to get such buy-in). -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
Richard W.M. Jones
2020-Aug-04 21:28 UTC
Re: [Libguestfs] using SPDX tags in libnbd and/or nbdkit?
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:23:11PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:> As the topic has been coming up in other projects recently (for > example, see > https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-ci/-/merge_requests/39), should > we update our files to either add SPDX tags, or even outright > condense our existing copyright blurbs down to an SPDX tag plus > documentation in a top-level file? The former (adding a line) is > less problematic, the latter definitely requires buy-in from all > contributors (although the list of contributors is relatively small, > so it might be easy enough to get such buy-in).I strongly disagree with dropping existing boilerplate, because it most precisely describes the license (especially for nbdkit / BSD license where it completely describes the license). At the end of the day the law is still processed by humans. However I'm fine with adding SPDX tags to files in both projects since it will improve automatic checking. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v