similar to: using SPDX tags in libnbd and/or nbdkit?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "using SPDX tags in libnbd and/or nbdkit?"

2017 Nov 24
2
[PATCH] uapi: add SPDX identifier to vm_sockets_diag.h
New file seems to have missed the SPDX license scan and update. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin at microsoft.com> --- include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets_diag.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets_diag.h b/include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets_diag.h index 14cd7dc5a187..0b4dd54f3d1e 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets_diag.h +++
2017 Nov 24
2
[PATCH] uapi: add SPDX identifier to vm_sockets_diag.h
New file seems to have missed the SPDX license scan and update. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin at microsoft.com> --- include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets_diag.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets_diag.h b/include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets_diag.h index 14cd7dc5a187..0b4dd54f3d1e 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/vm_sockets_diag.h +++
2005 Jan 01
2
libFLAC bitbuffer optimizations
Josh Coalson <xflac@yahoo.com> wrote: > thanks for the patch. No prob :) > also, if you have miroslav's patch again a more updated version > of bitbuffer.c that would be great. I have been meaning to get > around to applying it for a long time. This is Miroslav's patch, from the mailing list post I dug up in the archives: --- orig/src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c +++
2004 Sep 10
4
bitbuffer optimizations
Ok, here is a patch waiting for new CVS :). It works fine for me, but please check it before commiting... -- Miroslav Lichvar -------------- next part -------------- --- src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c.orig 2003-01-30 17:36:01.000000000 +0100 +++ src/libFLAC/bitbuffer.c 2003-01-30 21:53:18.000000000 +0100 @@ -51,6 +51,25 @@ */ static const unsigned FLAC__BITBUFFER_DEFAULT_CAPACITY = ((65536 - 64) *
2004 Dec 28
2
libFLAC bitbuffer optimizations
Pulled from my Arch archive, this following patch seems to have made quite a difference in getting my ARM7TDMI chip to play FLAC (compression levels 0-2) on my ipod. I don't have benchmarks with hard numbers, but playing with skips vs playing without skips is a fairly noticeable difference. memcpy and memset on uClibc are optimized in asm for the ARM7TDMI in uClibc. Other hardware/libc
2018 Sep 09
2
[Bug 107874] New: Incorrect SPDX-License-Identifier on various nouveau drm kernel source files?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107874 Bug ID: 107874 Summary: Incorrect SPDX-License-Identifier on various nouveau drm kernel source files? Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: NetBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium
2023 Mar 01
2
[nbdkit PATCH 0/5] ci: Get to green status on FreeBSD and MacOS
On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote: > I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the > grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have > Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms. > > This series got me to a green checkmark: > https://gitlab.com/ebblake/nbdkit/-/pipelines/793156983 > > but depends on an as-yet
2023 Sep 05
1
[libnbd PATCH] rust: Use mio::poll instead of requiring epoll
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 06:59:15PM +0000, Tage Johansson wrote: > > > > + // can be both readable and writable, but we survive just fine > > > + // if we only see one direction even when both are available. > > > + poll.registry().register( > > > + &mut SourceFd(&fd), > > > + Token(0), > >
2004 Oct 16
1
FLAC Process_single... read:write ratio ?
I'm just trying to wrap the flac decoder into a push model class... as i'm having a few threading problems in corner cases. One thing i need to fnid out is... if i call process_single() and let the read callback give the decoder exactly one packet/frame. Is the write_callback garaunteed to only be fired once ? Also one other thing... this where is always crashes... Line 374 in
2023 Mar 01
7
[nbdkit PATCH 0/5] ci: Get to green status on FreeBSD and MacOS
I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms. This series got me to a green checkmark: https://gitlab.com/ebblake/nbdkit/-/pipelines/793156983 but depends on an as-yet uncommitted patch in libvirt-ci:
2015 Jun 13
2
C5 : Firefox 38 bug
On 06/12/2015 12:58 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/13/2015 09:55 AM, jd1008 wrote: >> The most offensive problems of using browsers is that >> they do not tell you nor ask your permission when javascripts >> spy on your entire storage contents. > > Neither javascript nor Java applets can access the local filesystem. > Applets launched by JNLP can do so, but that
2023 Aug 18
1
[nbdkit PATCH] cc: Allow configuration without absolute paths
In https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/merge_requests/30, Khem reports that in a cross-compilation environment, nbdkit embeds the absolute name of the cross-compiler into the resulting cc plugin, even though running the plugin should be favoring the bare name 'cc'. This in turn leads to non-reproducible builds. As the goal of cross-compiling nbdkit is to produce a binary that behaves
2019 Jul 22
1
DNS Zone Transfers are Enabled
Thanks Roland, You are correct. Our Bind9 DLZ is version 9.9.4. I'll have to check if I will be able to upgrade to a newer version of Bind, these are on our production servers. On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 9:40 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 22/07/2019 08:24, Eben Victor via samba wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I hope someone might be
2023 Aug 18
1
[nbdkit PATCH] cc: Allow configuration without absolute paths
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 08:27:45AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > In https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit/-/merge_requests/30, Khem reports > that in a cross-compilation environment, nbdkit embeds the absolute > name of the cross-compiler into the resulting cc plugin, even though > running the plugin should be favoring the bare name 'cc'. This in > turn leads to non-reproducible
2023 Mar 01
1
[nbdkit PATCH 0/5] ci: Get to green status on FreeBSD and MacOS
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 06:43:11PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 3/1/23 17:54, Eric Blake wrote: > > I took the easy route of crippling what I couldn't get working, on the > > grounds that partial coverage is better than none now that we have > > Cirrus CI checking commits on additional platforms. > > > > This series got me to a green checkmark: > >
2011 Mar 10
1
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 release notes + "Projects using LLVM" + API changes
Hi All, With 2.9 starting to make its way out into the world, it is time to start poking at the release notes. I plan to make a pass through llvm-commits to cull some of the major changes into bullets, but am already behind and insanely busy with other stuff over the next week. If you have commit access, I'd really appreciate it if you could take a pass through llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
2019 Jun 27
1
Re: [libnbd PATCH 2/2] poll: Improve our interface
On 6/26/19 11:29 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > Make nbd_poll slightly more like poll(), allowing a user to detect > timeouts by returning 0 on timeout and 1 when we made progress. It > turns out that none of our internal uses ever expect a timeout (we > only call nbd_internal_poll with timeout==-1 because we expect a reply > from the server), but the public function might as well be
2019 Dec 29
2
securing a hop
for the A nat B C connect back to A using -R 2222:localhost:22 pattern, (see diagram at https://github.com/daradib/sidedoor) I want to limit B's user to just what is needed to do the port forward. I am hoping this is documented, but I can't find much more than "you should future out how to secre it." I setup an ansible playbook to instal and configure sidedoor on A. I have
2019 Jun 27
0
[libnbd PATCH 2/2] poll: Improve our interface
Make nbd_poll slightly more like poll(), allowing a user to detect timeouts by returning 0 on timeout and 1 when we made progress. It turns out that none of our internal uses ever expect a timeout (we only call nbd_internal_poll with timeout==-1 because we expect a reply from the server), but the public function might as well be nicer. Also handle POLLERR (server closed its read end, so our
2019 Jun 12
0
Re: [nbdkit PATCH v3 0/5] Play with libnbd for nbdkit-nbd
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 04:00:08PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > libnbd-0.1.4-1 is now available in Fedora 29/30 updates testing. > > Diffs since v2 - rebase to master, bump from libnbd 0.1.2 to 0.1.3+, > add tests to TLS usage which flushed out the need to turn relative > pathnames into absolute, doc tweaks > > Now that the testsuite covers TLS and libnbd has been fixed to