Hi all, It has been the case for quite a while that the master tree is unambiguously better than 6.03. I have thus tagged and pushed out a syslinux-6.04-pre2 release, however, due to the issues with continuing to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive to: https://www.zytor.com/pub/syslinux/ Other than the URL, there is no difference from the kernel.org archive. -hpa
Thanks. Any chance to update the changelog as well. The NEWS file in the archive over at https://www.zytor.com/pub/syslinux/Testing/6.04/ only lists changes for 6.03 On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 5:08 PM H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux < syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > It has been the case for quite a while that the master tree is > unambiguously better than 6.03. I have thus tagged and pushed out a > syslinux-6.04-pre2 release, however, due to the issues with continuing > to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive > to: > > https://www.zytor.com/pub/syslinux/ > > Other than the URL, there is no difference from the kernel.org archive. > > -hpa > _______________________________________________ > Syslinux mailing list > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com > Unsubscribe or set options at: > http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux >-- Tech III * AppControl * Endpoint Protection * Server Maintenance Buncombe County Schools Technology Department Network Group ComicSans Awareness Campaign <http://comicsanscriminal.com>
On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 14:07 -0800, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote:> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Hi all, > > It has been the case for quite a while that the master tree is > unambiguously better than 6.03. I have thus tagged and pushed out a > syslinux-6.04-pre2 release, however, due to the issues with continuing > to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive to:Please add a non ancient gnu-efi snapshot too. Jocke
On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 16:00 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:> On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 14:07 -0800, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > It has been the case for quite a while that the master tree is > > unambiguously better than 6.03. I have thus tagged and pushed out a > > syslinux-6.04-pre2 release, however, due to the issues with continuing > > to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive to: > > Please add a non ancient gnu-efi snapshot too. > > JockeYou vill need two commits( Update the longjump calls to fit the new declaration, The VPrint definition is now part of the exports of gnu-efi) from https://github.com/joakim-tjernlund/syslinux/commits/master to build against a modern gnu-efi Jocke
> Any chance to update the changelog as well. The NEWS file in the archive > over at https://www.zytor.com/pub/syslinux/Testing/6.04/ only lists changes > for 6.03The official 'NEWS' file has not been updated yet, but see: www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Syslinux_6_Changelog#Changes_in_6.04 Regards, Ady.
> however, due to the issues with continuing > to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive to:Will the archive repo in kernel.org ever be updated again? Will the archive repo in kernel.org be updated when some potential/hypothetical/future final/gold version gets released? Will the git repo in kernel.org ever be updated again? These questions are _not_ just for simple curiosity. TIA, Ady.
On 2/6/19 9:35 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:>> however, due to the issues with continuing >> to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive to: > > Will the archive repo in kernel.org ever be updated again? > > Will the archive repo in kernel.org be updated when some > potential/hypothetical/future final/gold version gets released? > > Will the git repo in kernel.org ever be updated again? > > These questions are _not_ just for simple curiosity. >That is TBD, but probably not. -hpa