Joan Lluch via llvm-dev
2019-Oct-26 20:26 UTC
[llvm-dev] [AVR] [MSP430] Code gen improvements for 8 bit and 16 bit targets
Hi, In relation to this subject, I have submitted bug reports, baseline tests, and patches that go towards this goal: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43542 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43542> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43559 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43559> https://reviews.llvm.org/D69099 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69099> (baseline tests) https://reviews.llvm.org/D69116 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69116> (patch 1) https://reviews.llvm.org/D69120 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69120> (patch 2) https://reviews.llvm.org/D69326 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69326> (patch 3) I got the baseline tests and patch 1 accepted and commited by member Sanjay, which was great. However, the remaining patches have remained silent for some time now with no comments or suggestions. I have some additional work waiting to be proposed to the community, but I would like to know whether I am on the right track, particularly regarding the already proposed patches. Thanks in advance. John -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191026/688ecc82/attachment.html>
Anton Korobeynikov via llvm-dev
2019-Oct-26 22:43 UTC
[llvm-dev] [AVR] [MSP430] Code gen improvements for 8 bit and 16 bit targets
Hello Joan, The LLVM developers meeting was on the week and this is why it was a bit silent (along with github migration). I will try to review the remaining patches soon. On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 1:27 PM Joan Lluch via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > Hi, > > In relation to this subject, I have submitted bug reports, baseline tests, and patches that go towards this goal: > > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43542 > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43559 > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D69099 (baseline tests) > https://reviews.llvm.org/D69116 (patch 1) > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D69120 (patch 2) > https://reviews.llvm.org/D69326 (patch 3) > > I got the baseline tests and patch 1 accepted and commited by member Sanjay, which was great. > > However, the remaining patches have remained silent for some time now with no comments or suggestions. I have some additional work waiting to be proposed to the community, but I would like to know whether I am on the right track, particularly regarding the already proposed patches. > > Thanks in advance. > > John > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University
Joan Lluch via llvm-dev
2019-Oct-28 07:20 UTC
[llvm-dev] [AVR] [MSP430] Code gen improvements for 8 bit and 16 bit targets
Hi Anton, Thank you for your reply, I completely understand that. There's really no hurry but I appreciate your disposition. John> On 27 Oct 2019, at 00:43, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Hello Joan, > > The LLVM developers meeting was on the week and this is why it was a > bit silent (along with github migration). I will try to review the > remaining patches soon. > > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 1:27 PM Joan Lluch via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In relation to this subject, I have submitted bug reports, baseline tests, and patches that go towards this goal: >> >> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43542 >> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43559 >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D69099 (baseline tests) >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D69116 (patch 1) >> >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D69120 (patch 2) >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D69326 (patch 3) >> >> I got the baseline tests and patch 1 accepted and commited by member Sanjay, which was great. >> >> However, the remaining patches have remained silent for some time now with no comments or suggestions. I have some additional work waiting to be proposed to the community, but I would like to know whether I am on the right track, particularly regarding the already proposed patches. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> John >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Department of Statistical Modelling, Saint Petersburg State University
Reasonably Related Threads
- [AVR] [MSP430] Code gen improvements for 8 bit and 16 bit targets
- [AVR] [MSP430] Code gen improvements for 8 bit and 16 bit targets
- [AVR] [MSP430] Code gen improvements for 8 bit and 16 bit targets
- [AVR] [MSP430] Code gen improvements for 8 bit and 16 bit targets
- Has anybody tried to program MSP430 microcontrollers from TI?