Dear LLVM devs, I just submitted a patch: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10149. However, Phabricator is warning me that "this revision needs review, but there are no reviewers specified". How should I determine who the reviewers should be? Thanks, Alex Dowad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150605/b52d0dcd/attachment.html>
Look at the CODE_OWNERS.txt file, find the places your patch touches and who owns them, add those people to the review. At least that's what I've been told previously when submitting patches. -Neil. On 05/06/15 10:54, Alex wrote:> Dear LLVM devs, > > I just submitted a patch: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10149 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D10149&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=nZZqzbxhY7-xAfSiCDcR2N_iD2VxcU1KAZOU2nmF-50&s=cp7ZvsQqW1U9EYlIGQEAvE8Nmp1zXoM8rF3cezzN7IM&e=>. > However, Phabricator is warning me that "this revision needs review, > but there are no reviewers specified". > > How should I determine who the reviewers should be? > > Thanks, > Alex Dowad > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150605/4034d52e/attachment.html>
You can also look for people patching CFI- or X86- related code. 2015-06-05 13:11 GMT+03:00 Neil Henning <llvm at duskborn.com>:> Look at the CODE_OWNERS.txt file, find the places your patch touches and > who owns them, add those people to the review. At least that's what I've > been told previously when submitting patches. > > -Neil. > > > On 05/06/15 10:54, Alex wrote: > > Dear LLVM devs, > > I just submitted a patch: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10149 > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__reviews.llvm.org_D10149&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=nZZqzbxhY7-xAfSiCDcR2N_iD2VxcU1KAZOU2nmF-50&s=cp7ZvsQqW1U9EYlIGQEAvE8Nmp1zXoM8rF3cezzN7IM&e=>. > However, Phabricator is warning me that "this revision needs review, but > there are no reviewers specified". > > How should I determine who the reviewers should be? > > Thanks, > Alex Dowad > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing listLLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.eduhttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150605/2bdb4e01/attachment.html>
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [Bug 2478] New: Escape sequences (starting with ~) don't work when remote shell is BusyBox ash
- [LLVMdev] Generate .debug_info for asm files?
- [LLVMdev] Questions about DWARF handling (esp. re: file and line data)
- [LLVMdev] Generate .debug_info for asm files?
- Rails Cookbook - call for contrib/reviewers