similar to: [LLVMdev] Who to assign as "reviewers" for a patch??

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2478 Bug ID: 2478 Summary: Escape sequences (starting with ~) don't work when remote shell is BusyBox ash Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

Dear LLVM devs, I've noticed that LLVM's assembler (and hence clang) doesn't generate debug data when assembling, even when run with "-g". Users can add their own CFI/line number data with assembler directives. But GDB ignores the line number data if you don't have a DIE in the .debug_info section which identifies the compilation unit. (I'm not an expert on GDB, but

Dear LLVM devs, I'm just working on the LLVM assembler's handling of .file and .line directives. I've noticed some strange things and am wondering if there is a reason the code works the way it does. 1. MCContext keeps a map of number -> MCDwarfLineTable called MCDwarfLineTablesCUMap. However, as far as I can see, the only compilation unit number which is *ever* used is zero! If

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Alex <alexinbeijing at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear LLVM devs, > > I've noticed that LLVM's assembler (and hence clang) doesn't generate > debug data when assembling, even when run with "-g". > Sorry, let me correct that: the assembler does generate the .debug_info section (as well as line number data) when run with

Hi, I''m working on the Rails Cookbook for O''Reilly and am looking for contributors/reviewers. I you''re interested in helping (in any way), I''d love to talk you. Send me an email off list. The current outline (work in progress) is here: http://railscookbook.org/WEB-1.0-outline/current Thanks! Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi all. Guys in accordance to PR1255 I need to add case-ranges support for passes listed in subject. Who can review some of these passes in nearest future? Thanks! -Stepan.

I watched some LLVM videos yesterday and there was one where Chandler Carruth was saying that LLVM/clang needed more Windows savvy developers to review patches. Is this still the case? If so, how do I contribute? -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org> The

Richard <legalize at xmission.com> writes: > I watched some LLVM videos yesterday and there was one where Chandler > Carruth was saying that LLVM/clang needed more Windows savvy > developers to review patches. > > Is this still the case? If so, how do I contribute? Just to be more verbose that Anton... :-) Subscribe to llvm-commits and cfe-commits mailing lists, watch for

Hi, Thought there would be some interest here. I'm writing a small book on OpenSSH. Am now looking for tech reviewers. http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/902 ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Latest book: Network Flow Analysis http://www.networkflowanalysis.com/ mwlucas at BlackHelicopters.org, Twitter @mwlauthor

As you all know, one of the biggest criticisms of Asterisk has been the lack of documentation. Paul Mahler of Signate has taken the initiative and is writing an introductory guide to Asterisk that Digium plans to help publish. This is a guide for beginners, not for gurus. I would like to see the community help Paul in his efforts to help document Asterisk and make it easier for someone to start

I'm getting lots of grief from reviewers about figures generated with the envfit function in the Vegan package. Has anyone else struggled to effectively explain this analysis? If so, can you share any helpful tips? The most recent comment I've gotten back: "What this shows is which NMDS axis separates the communities, not the relationship between the edaphic factor and the

Some people contribute to someone specific fs testing mostly, record some of them as Reviewer. Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang at kernel.org> --- If someone doesn't want to be in cc list of related fstests patch, please reply this email, I'll remove that reviewer line. Or if someone else (who contribute to fstests very much) would like to a specific reviewer, nominate yourself to

I just saw this, and I have to say -- thanks, Kristof! Do you know if this is something that could be automated in Phabricator, instead of something that people run on their own? Or is the intent of this to be something that ran regularly (say, weekly or daily) that would email people (or the list) that could be doing the reviews for some of the open patches? On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 1:01 AM,

Hi, At the last EuroLLVM, I gave a lightning talk about code review statistics on Phabricator reviews and what we could derive from that to try and reduce waiting-for-review bottlenecks. (see https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/talks.html#Lightning_2). One of the items I pointed to is a script we've been using internally for a little while to try and match open Phabricator reviews to people who